Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Reversible cellular automaton"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>David Eppstein (New DYK nom) |
imported>Opabinia regalis (gtg) |
||
| Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Long and new enough as a new GA; no copyvio, close paraphrasing, or other content problems; hook statement cited inline. Nice work on an interesting topic (but here's hoping I remember to check how many clicks this gets :) Good to go. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] ([[User talk:Opabinia regalis|talk]]) 06:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 06:01, 7 October 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Reversible cellular automaton
- ... that for conventional computers, Landauer's principle gives a nonzero lower bound on energy per step, but the energy usage of reversible cellular automata can be arbitrarily close to zero?
- Reviewed: Leschi (fireboat)
Improved to Good Article status by David Eppstein (talk). Self-nominated at 20:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC).
Long and new enough as a new GA; no copyvio, close paraphrasing, or other content problems; hook statement cited inline. Nice work on an interesting topic (but here's hoping I remember to check how many clicks this gets :) Good to go. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)