Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Reversible cellular automaton"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Opabinia regalis
(gtg)
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(To Prep 5)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from October 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=October 2015  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Reversible cellular automaton====
 
====Reversible cellular automaton====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Reversible cellular automaton|Reversible cellular automaton}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Reversible cellular automaton|Reversible cellular automaton}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that  for conventional computers, [[Landauer's principle]] gives a nonzero lower bound on energy per step, but the energy usage of '''[[Reversible cellular automaton|reversible cellular automata]]''' can be arbitrarily close to zero?
 
* ... that  for conventional computers, [[Landauer's principle]] gives a nonzero lower bound on energy per step, but the energy usage of '''[[Reversible cellular automaton|reversible cellular automata]]''' can be arbitrarily close to zero?
  
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Leschi (fireboat)|Leschi (fireboat)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Leschi (fireboat)|Leschi (fireboat)]]
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:David Eppstein|David Eppstein]] ([[User talk:David Eppstein|talk]]). Self-nominated at 20:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Reversible cellular automaton|David Eppstein|subpage=Reversible cellular automaton}}
 
-->
 
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Long and new enough as a new GA; no copyvio, close paraphrasing, or other content problems; hook statement cited inline. Nice work on an interesting topic (but here's hoping I remember to check how many clicks this gets :) Good to go. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] ([[User talk:Opabinia regalis|talk]]) 06:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)
 
  
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Long and new enough as a new GA; no copyvio, close paraphrasing, or other content problems; hook statement cited inline. Nice work on an interesting topic (but here's hoping I remember to check how many clicks this gets :) Good to go. [[User:Opabinia regalis|Opabinia regalis]] ([[User talk:Opabinia regalis|talk]]) 06:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 05:46, 12 October 2015

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:45, 12 October 2015 (UTC)

Reversible cellular automaton

Improved to Good Article status by David Eppstein (talk). Self-nominated at 20:23, 1 October 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Long and new enough as a new GA; no copyvio, close paraphrasing, or other content problems; hook statement cited inline. Nice work on an interesting topic (but here's hoping I remember to check how many clicks this gets :) Good to go. Opabinia regalis (talk) 06:00, 7 October 2015 (UTC)