Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Rheingauer Dom"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gerda Arendt (reviewed) |
imported>CeeGee (reviewed) |
||
| Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] I am confused whether the nomination is eligible for date reasons or not because it was created with 807 prosa chars on August 13 from a redirect page and reached the length of 1,640 chars on August 20, the day of nomination. Isn't it a case of expansion instead of creation? If yes, then it wasn't expanded 5x as required. '''Please help'''. Otherwise, the article cites sources with inline citations and no close paraphrasing was found. Hook length is within limit, and it is interesting. Hook fact is inline cited, however the reference isn't online accessible for me. I AGF. QPQ was done. Image is ©-free under "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" and used in the article. I'll approve the nom when my above question is answered by an experienced reviewer with "it's eligibile". --[[User talk:CeeGee|CeeGee]] 08:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC) |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 08:30, 3 September 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Rheingauer Dom
- ... that the facade and towers of the Gothic Rheingauer Dom (pictured) in Geisenheim were added in the 19th century?
- Reviewed: Fritz Delius
Created by Gerda Arendt (talk). Self nominated at 17:18, 20 August 2014 (UTC).
I am confused whether the nomination is eligible for date reasons or not because it was created with 807 prosa chars on August 13 from a redirect page and reached the length of 1,640 chars on August 20, the day of nomination. Isn't it a case of expansion instead of creation? If yes, then it wasn't expanded 5x as required. Please help. Otherwise, the article cites sources with inline citations and no close paraphrasing was found. Hook length is within limit, and it is interesting. Hook fact is inline cited, however the reference isn't online accessible for me. I AGF. QPQ was done. Image is ©-free under "Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 Unported" and used in the article. I'll approve the nom when my above question is answered by an experienced reviewer with "it's eligibile". --CeeGee 08:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)
