Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Robert Lee Burns"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Premeditated Chaos
(create DYK nom for Robert Lee Burns)
 
imported>Alex Shih
(review)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article was significant expanded on 16 July. The content itself appears to be fine, I don't see any concerns of neutrality. Every paragraph are backed with at least one source also. As for the hook, I prefer '''ALT1''' better, shorter and better clarity. Hook fact is both in the article and confirmed by the NYT source. Based on QPQ check this appears to be the first submission to DYK, so the user is exempt from QPQ. The article should be ready to go. [[User:Alex Shih|Alex Shih]][[User_talk:Alex Shih|<sup>Talk</sup>]] 11:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 11:50, 22 July 2017

Robert Lee Burns

  • ... that Robert Lee Burns, a reformed convict from Oregon, narrowly avoided being extradited to California just 21 miles north of the border, when Oregon State troopers stopped the prison transport van and served an emergency stay of extradition ...? Source: New York Times
    • ALT1:... that that Robert Lee Burns, a reformed convict from Oregon, was the subject of an interstate extradition battle between Oregon and California ...? Source: New York Times
    • ALT2:... that Robert Lee Burns, a reformed convict from Oregon, spent the last year of his life in 2001 fighting to avoid extradition to California to serve a prison sentence from 1963 ...? Source: New York Times

5x expanded by Premeditated Chaos (talk). Self-nominated at 00:16, 17 July 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Article was significant expanded on 16 July. The content itself appears to be fine, I don't see any concerns of neutrality. Every paragraph are backed with at least one source also. As for the hook, I prefer ALT1 better, shorter and better clarity. Hook fact is both in the article and confirmed by the NYT source. Based on QPQ check this appears to be the first submission to DYK, so the user is exempt from QPQ. The article should be ready to go. Alex ShihTalk 11:49, 22 July 2017 (UTC)