Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Romeo Acop"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(need reviewer to determine QPQ quality and if okay do full nomination review)
imported>Samar
(Pass)
Line 10: Line 10:
  
 
-->
 
-->
{{*mp}}... that '''[[Romeo Acop]]''' is the [[incumbent]] [[House of Representatives of the Philippines|representative]] of [[Antipolo City]]'s [[Legislative districts of Antipolo City#2nd_District|Second Legislative District]]?
+
{{*mp}}... that '''[[Romeo Acop]]''' is the incumbent [[House of Representatives of the Philippines|representative]] of [[Antipolo City]]'s [[Legislative districts of Antipolo City#2nd_District|Second Legislative District]]?
 
<!--
 
<!--
 
-->
 
-->
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]]  New reviewer can decide whether odd quid pro quo review done is adequate since I have a conflict of interest (I had to do the cleanup). [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]]  New reviewer can decide whether odd quid pro quo review done is adequate since I have a conflict of interest (I had to do the cleanup). [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
 +
 +
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] QPQ review is not proper but I am only passing this to clean up the backlog and because some of other QPQs by the user are also incomplete/improper, but he is putting some effort. Article >1500 characters and new on date of nomination. Hook is sourced. I have removed incumbent link to avoid clutter of links in the hook. [[User:Samar|<font color="#367588" face="CommercialScript BT" size="4" >Samar</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Samar|<font color="#008080" face="Andalus" >Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:21, 20 September 2012

Romeo Acop

Created/expanded by Arius1998 (talk). Self nom at 14:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Nominator is required to submit a quid pro quo (QPQ) review within a week's time, and is reminded that QPQ's are always required when submitting a DYK nomination after the first five. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote4.png New reviewer can decide whether odd quid pro quo review done is adequate since I have a conflict of interest (I had to do the cleanup). BlueMoonset (talk) 03:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg QPQ review is not proper but I am only passing this to clean up the backlog and because some of other QPQs by the user are also incomplete/improper, but he is putting some effort. Article >1500 characters and new on date of nomination. Hook is sourced. I have removed incumbent link to avoid clutter of links in the hook. Samar Talk 15:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)