Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Romeo Acop"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Samar (Pass) |
imported>PumpkinSky (prep4) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from August 2012]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
− | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">Pumpkin</font><font color="darkblue">Sky</font>]] [[User talk:PumpkinSky|<font color="darkorange">talk</font>]] 22:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)<br />}} |
====Romeo Acop==== | ====Romeo Acop==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Romeo Acop|Romeo Acop}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Romeo Acop|Romeo Acop}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
{{*mp}}... that '''[[Romeo Acop]]''' is the incumbent [[House of Representatives of the Philippines|representative]] of [[Antipolo City]]'s [[Legislative districts of Antipolo City#2nd_District|Second Legislative District]]? | {{*mp}}... that '''[[Romeo Acop]]''' is the incumbent [[House of Representatives of the Philippines|representative]] of [[Antipolo City]]'s [[Legislative districts of Antipolo City#2nd_District|Second Legislative District]]? | ||
− | |||
− | |||
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Edward Steves Homestead|Edward Steves Homestead]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Edward Steves Homestead|Edward Steves Homestead]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Arius1998|Arius1998]] ([[User talk:Arius1998|talk]]). Self nom at 14:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Arius1998|Arius1998]] ([[User talk:Arius1998|talk]]). Self nom at 14:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
:*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Nominator is required to submit a quid pro quo (QPQ) review within a week's time, and is reminded that QPQ's are always required when submitting a DYK nomination after the first five. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 05:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Nominator is required to submit a quid pro quo (QPQ) review within a week's time, and is reminded that QPQ's are always required when submitting a DYK nomination after the first five. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 05:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
Line 23: | Line 13: | ||
:*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]] New reviewer can decide whether odd quid pro quo review done is adequate since I have a conflict of interest (I had to do the cleanup). [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol redirect vote4.png|16px]] New reviewer can decide whether odd quid pro quo review done is adequate since I have a conflict of interest (I had to do the cleanup). [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] QPQ review is not proper but I am only passing this to clean up the backlog and because some of other QPQs by the user are also incomplete/improper, but he is putting some effort. Article >1500 characters and new on date of nomination. Hook is sourced. I have removed incumbent link to avoid clutter of links in the hook. [[User:Samar|<font color="#367588" face="CommercialScript BT" size="4" >Samar</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Samar|<font color="#008080" face="Andalus" >Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC) | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] QPQ review is not proper but I am only passing this to clean up the backlog and because some of other QPQs by the user are also incomplete/improper, but he is putting some effort. Article >1500 characters and new on date of nomination. Hook is sourced. I have removed incumbent link to avoid clutter of links in the hook. [[User:Samar|<font color="#367588" face="CommercialScript BT" size="4" >Samar</font>]] <sup> [[User talk:Samar|<font color="#008080" face="Andalus" >Talk</font>]]</sup> 15:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
− | |||
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 22:00, 20 September 2012
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by PumpkinSky talk 22:00, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
Romeo Acop
- ... that Romeo Acop is the incumbent representative of Antipolo City's Second Legislative District?
- Reviewed: Edward Steves Homestead
Created/expanded by Arius1998 (talk). Self nom at 14:15, 29 August 2012 (UTC)
Nominator is required to submit a quid pro quo (QPQ) review within a week's time, and is reminded that QPQ's are always required when submitting a DYK nomination after the first five. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:49, 13 September 2012 (UTC)
New reviewer can decide whether odd quid pro quo review done is adequate since I have a conflict of interest (I had to do the cleanup). BlueMoonset (talk) 03:05, 20 September 2012 (UTC)
QPQ review is not proper but I am only passing this to clean up the backlog and because some of other QPQs by the user are also incomplete/improper, but he is putting some effort. Article >1500 characters and new on date of nomination. Hook is sourced. I have removed incumbent link to avoid clutter of links in the hook. Samar Talk 15:21, 20 September 2012 (UTC)