Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Rosia Water Tanks"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Maile66
(2nd Review in progress)
imported>Maile66
(2 Reviews complete - this is ready for Promotion to a Prep area)
Line 26: Line 26:
 
:::Thanks for your review. [[User:ACP2011|Anne]] ([[User talk:ACP2011|talk]]) 23:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
 
:::Thanks for your review. [[User:ACP2011|Anne]] ([[User talk:ACP2011|talk]]) 23:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
  
:*'''Review 2''': {{In progress}}
+
:*'''Review 2''': <s>{{In progress}}</s>
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
 
 +
:<u>'''REVIEW #2 COMPLETED - The following has been checked in this review by Maile66'''</u>
 +
::*QPQ done by ACP2011 on September 16, 2012
 +
::*Article created  by ACP2011 on September 14, 2012 and has 6,757 characters of readable prose
 +
::*'''No COI''' detected
 +
::*'''No overt promotional''' tone detected (what are the standards for that, anyway?) that would distinguish it from any other repeated topic by any other author
 +
::*NPOV, well sourced
 +
::*Anne's usual above-average professional-level quality of output; extremely well-done piece of work about an area's historical structures being destroyed to make way for modern progress
 +
::*Every paragraph sourced
 +
::*Hook is interesting, short enough at 136 characters, and sourced at the end of the sentence
 +
::*Duplication Detector run, no copyvio found}}
 +
 
 +
*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] This nomination now qualifies for promotion per  terms set at [[Wikipedia_talk:Did_you_know/GibraltarPediA_Options|DYK GibraltarPediA Options]]
 +
::&nbsp;—&nbsp; {{User-multi
 +
|doc=yes
 +
|User=Maile66
 +
|1=t
 +
}} 12:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)
 +
 
 +
<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 12:44, 10 October 2012

Rosia Water Tanks

Created/expanded by ACP2011 (talk). Self nom at 13:06, 16 September 2012 (UTC)

  • Review 1:
Symbol confirmed.svg Article appears to meet requirements.♦ Dr. Blofeld 18:19, 18 September 2012 (UTC)
Thanks for your review. Anne (talk) 23:32, 19 September 2012 (UTC)
  • Review 2: clock In progress
REVIEW #2 COMPLETED - The following has been checked in this review by Maile66
  • QPQ done by ACP2011 on September 16, 2012
  • Article created by ACP2011 on September 14, 2012 and has 6,757 characters of readable prose
  • No COI detected
  • No overt promotional tone detected (what are the standards for that, anyway?) that would distinguish it from any other repeated topic by any other author
  • NPOV, well sourced
  • Anne's usual above-average professional-level quality of output; extremely well-done piece of work about an area's historical structures being destroyed to make way for modern progress
  • Every paragraph sourced
  • Hook is interesting, short enough at 136 characters, and sourced at the end of the sentence
  • Duplication Detector run, no copyvio found
 —  Template:User-multi 12:44, 10 October 2012 (UTC)