Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Rosika Schwimmer"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Maile66 (passes review) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 3) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from November 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 07:15, 14 December 2019 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|Rosika Schwimmer}} | {{DYK header|Rosika Schwimmer}} | ||
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | <div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img"> | ||
{{main page image|image=Rosika Schwimmer, 1914.png|caption=Schwimmer by Harris & Ewing|width=133x150}} | {{main page image|image=Rosika Schwimmer, 1914.png|caption=Schwimmer by Harris & Ewing|width=133x150}} | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that in 1929 '''[[Rosika Schwimmer]]''' ''(pictured)'', a woman over 50 and ineligible to serve to defend the country, was denied citizenship by the U.S. Supreme Court for pacifism and became [[Statelessness|stateless]]? <small>Source: [https://www.newspapers.com/clip/38101488/climate_of_befuddled_innocence_the/ "She was denied it (citizenship) because she refused to take and oath that she would support the Constitution, if necessary by bearing arms for her country".]; [https://archive.org/details/justicesupremeco00tres/page/72 "It is agreed that she is qualified for citizenship, except so far as the views …in favor of pacifism… I hardly can see how that is affected by the statement, inasmuch as she is a woman over fifty years of age, and would not be allowed to bear arms if she wanted to." (pp. 72-73); and [https://archive.org/stream/mostdangerouswom00anne_0#page/216/mode/1up "…she was denied American citizenship on the grounds that she 'refused to bear arms', and she died stateless"] (p. 216). </small> | * ... that in 1929 '''[[Rosika Schwimmer]]''' ''(pictured)'', a woman over 50 and ineligible to serve to defend the country, was denied citizenship by the U.S. Supreme Court for pacifism and became [[Statelessness|stateless]]? <small>Source: [https://www.newspapers.com/clip/38101488/climate_of_befuddled_innocence_the/ "She was denied it (citizenship) because she refused to take and oath that she would support the Constitution, if necessary by bearing arms for her country".]; [https://archive.org/details/justicesupremeco00tres/page/72 "It is agreed that she is qualified for citizenship, except so far as the views …in favor of pacifism… I hardly can see how that is affected by the statement, inasmuch as she is a woman over fifty years of age, and would not be allowed to bear arms if she wanted to." (pp. 72-73); and [https://archive.org/stream/mostdangerouswom00anne_0#page/216/mode/1up "…she was denied American citizenship on the grounds that she 'refused to bear arms', and she died stateless"] (p. 216). </small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':...? <small>Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)</small> | ** '''ALT1''':...? <small>Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Carole De Saram]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Carole De Saram]] | ||
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:SusunW|SusunW]] ([[User talk:SusunW|talk]]) and [[User:Ipigott|Ipigott]] ([[User talk:Ipigott|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:SusunW|SusunW]] ([[User talk:SusunW|talk]]) at 15:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC).</small> | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:SusunW|SusunW]] ([[User talk:SusunW|talk]]) and [[User:Ipigott|Ipigott]] ([[User talk:Ipigott|talk]]). Nominated by [[User:SusunW|SusunW]] ([[User talk:SusunW|talk]]) at 15:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] As the GA reviewer, I can be assured that the article meets all the requirements, and the hook is certainly interesting. Great work on this one! <span style="font-weight: bold">[[User:Fiamh|Fiamh]] <sup>([[User talk:Fiamh|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Fiamh|contribs]])</sup></span> 18:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] As the GA reviewer, I can be assured that the article meets all the requirements, and the hook is certainly interesting. Great work on this one! <span style="font-weight: bold">[[User:Fiamh|Fiamh]] <sup>([[User talk:Fiamh|talk]], [[Special:Contributions/Fiamh|contribs]])</sup></span> 18:06, 6 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
| Line 43: | Line 35: | ||
[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Well done, {{Re|SusunW}}. A truly impressive piece of work on a truly remarkable woman. Here's hoping you take this to FAC. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 22:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC) | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Well done, {{Re|SusunW}}. A truly impressive piece of work on a truly remarkable woman. Here's hoping you take this to FAC. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 22:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC) | ||
| − | + | {{-}}</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 07:15, 14 December 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:15, 14 December 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Rosika Schwimmer
Schwimmer by Harris & Ewing
Schwimmer by Harris & Ewing
- ... that in 1929 Rosika Schwimmer (pictured), a woman over 50 and ineligible to serve to defend the country, was denied citizenship by the U.S. Supreme Court for pacifism and became stateless? Source: "She was denied it (citizenship) because she refused to take and oath that she would support the Constitution, if necessary by bearing arms for her country".; "It is agreed that she is qualified for citizenship, except so far as the views …in favor of pacifism… I hardly can see how that is affected by the statement, inasmuch as she is a woman over fifty years of age, and would not be allowed to bear arms if she wanted to." (pp. 72-73); and [https://archive.org/stream/mostdangerouswom00anne_0#page/216/mode/1up "…she was denied American citizenship on the grounds that she 'refused to bear arms', and she died stateless" (p. 216).
- ALT1:...? Source: "You are strongly encouraged to quote the source text supporting each hook" (and [link] the source, or cite it briefly without using citation templates)
Improved to Good Article status by SusunW (talk) and Ipigott (talk). Nominated by SusunW (talk) at 15:48, 6 November 2019 (UTC).
- Review by Maile
- QPQ
- QPQ provided and not used on any other nomination
- Eligibility
- Achieved Good Article status on November 6, 2019
- Sourcing
- Article has made use of excellent verifiable sourcing, well-formatted
- Hook
- Hook is 176 characters, sourced as noted in this nomination, and a compilation of sourced statements in the Sections "Statelessness" and "Later Life".
- Images
- Image used in nomination, as well as all in the article, are of good quality and in the Public Domain, uploaded on Commons
- Copyvio check
- Earwig tool shows nothing of concern.
- Spot check also looks good
16px Well done, Template:Re. A truly impressive piece of work on a truly remarkable woman. Here's hoping you take this to FAC. — Maile (talk) 22:01, 11 November 2019 (UTC)
