Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Roupala montana"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (Undid revision 534797311 by Cwmhiraeth (talk): nomination missing two QPQs) |
imported>Guettarda |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
:::* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] This is a triple hook, which under DYK rules revised a few months ago requires three QPQ reviews. (It is no longer acceptable to do hook-for-hook reviews; article-for-article reviews are required.) Unfortunately, that means that another two reviews are required before this nomination can properly be approved. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 23:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | :::* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] This is a triple hook, which under DYK rules revised a few months ago requires three QPQ reviews. (It is no longer acceptable to do hook-for-hook reviews; article-for-article reviews are required.) Unfortunately, that means that another two reviews are required before this nomination can properly be approved. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 23:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::::*I wasn't aware of that requirement. I've added [[Template:Did you know nominations/Hierarchical generalized linear model|Hierarchical generalized linear model]] and [[Template:Did you know nominations/Cornulaca monacantha|Cornulaca monacantha]] [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 18:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 18:49, 29 January 2013
Roupala montana, Richeria grandis, Parinari campestris
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Roupala montana
- Richeria grandis
- Parinari campestris )
- ... that Roupala montana, Richeria grandis (pictured) and Parinari campestris, all known by the common name bois bandé, are reputed to have aphrodisiac properties?
- Reviewed: Shell growth in estuaries
Created/expanded by Guettarda (talk). Self nom at 15:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- Reviewing now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I assume good faith on the offline reference. This hook checks out otherwise. Richeria grandis is an expansion begun January 10, while the others are new enough January articles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
- 16px This is a triple hook, which under DYK rules revised a few months ago requires three QPQ reviews. (It is no longer acceptable to do hook-for-hook reviews; article-for-article reviews are required.) Unfortunately, that means that another two reviews are required before this nomination can properly be approved. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of that requirement. I've added Hierarchical generalized linear model and Cornulaca monacantha Guettarda (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)