Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Roupala montana"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(Undid revision 534797311 by Cwmhiraeth (talk): nomination missing two QPQs)
imported>Guettarda
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
:::* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] This is a triple hook, which under DYK rules revised a few months ago requires three QPQ reviews. (It is no longer acceptable to do hook-for-hook reviews; article-for-article reviews are required.) Unfortunately, that means that another two reviews are required before this nomination can properly be approved. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 23:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:::* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] This is a triple hook, which under DYK rules revised a few months ago requires three QPQ reviews. (It is no longer acceptable to do hook-for-hook reviews; article-for-article reviews are required.) Unfortunately, that means that another two reviews are required before this nomination can properly be approved. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 23:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
::::*I wasn't aware of that requirement. I've added [[Template:Did you know nominations/Hierarchical generalized linear model|Hierarchical generalized linear model]] and [[Template:Did you know nominations/Cornulaca monacantha|Cornulaca monacantha]] [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 18:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 18:49, 29 January 2013

Roupala montana, Richeria grandis, Parinari campestris

Female flowers of Richeria grandis

Created/expanded by Guettarda (talk). Self nom at 15:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)

  • 16px This is a triple hook, which under DYK rules revised a few months ago requires three QPQ reviews. (It is no longer acceptable to do hook-for-hook reviews; article-for-article reviews are required.) Unfortunately, that means that another two reviews are required before this nomination can properly be approved. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC)