Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Roupala montana"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset (restoring approval; additional QPQ reviews done) |
imported>Crisco 1492 (to prep 3) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | {{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from January 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 15:09, 30 January 2013 (UTC)<br />}} |
====Roupala montana, Richeria grandis, Parinari campestris==== | ====Roupala montana, Richeria grandis, Parinari campestris==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Roupala montana|Roupala montana|Richeria grandis|Parinari campestris}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Roupala montana|Roupala montana|Richeria grandis|Parinari campestris}} | ||
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | <div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;"> | ||
[[File:Richeria grandis Vahl.jpg|100x100px|Female flowers of ''Richeria grandis'']] | [[File:Richeria grandis Vahl.jpg|100x100px|Female flowers of ''Richeria grandis'']] | ||
| − | </div | + | </div> |
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
{{*mp}}... that '''''[[Roupala montana]]''''', '''''[[Richeria grandis]]''''' ''(pictured)'' and '''''[[Parinari campestris]]''''', all known by the common name ''bois bandé'', are reputed to have [[aphrodisiac]] properties? | {{*mp}}... that '''''[[Roupala montana]]''''', '''''[[Richeria grandis]]''''' ''(pictured)'' and '''''[[Parinari campestris]]''''', all known by the common name ''bois bandé'', are reputed to have [[aphrodisiac]] properties? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Shell growth in estuaries|Shell growth in estuaries]] | :*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Shell growth in estuaries|Shell growth in estuaries]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]). Self nom at 15:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)</small> | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]). Self nom at 15:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:*Reviewing now.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 14:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | :*Reviewing now.--[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 14:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| Line 33: | Line 22: | ||
:::::*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] As I said, it's a fairly recent change. Thanks for doing the two additional reviews. Restoring approval per TonyTheTiger, but using the gray AGF tick, since the key hook fact is dependent on an offline source. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 05:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC) | :::::*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] As I said, it's a fairly recent change. Thanks for doing the two additional reviews. Restoring approval per TonyTheTiger, but using the gray AGF tick, since the key hook fact is dependent on an offline source. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 05:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | {{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 15:09, 30 January 2013
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Crisco 1492 (talk) 15:09, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
Roupala montana, Richeria grandis, Parinari campestris
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Roupala montana
- Richeria grandis
- Parinari campestris )
- ... that Roupala montana, Richeria grandis (pictured) and Parinari campestris, all known by the common name bois bandé, are reputed to have aphrodisiac properties?
- Reviewed: Shell growth in estuaries
Created/expanded by Guettarda (talk). Self nom at 15:59, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
- Reviewing now.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 14:59, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
I assume good faith on the offline reference. This hook checks out otherwise. Richeria grandis is an expansion begun January 10, while the others are new enough January articles.--TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 15:47, 24 January 2013 (UTC)
This is a triple hook, which under DYK rules revised a few months ago requires three QPQ reviews. (It is no longer acceptable to do hook-for-hook reviews; article-for-article reviews are required.) Unfortunately, that means that another two reviews are required before this nomination can properly be approved. BlueMoonset (talk) 23:42, 25 January 2013 (UTC)
- I wasn't aware of that requirement. I've added Hierarchical generalized linear model and Cornulaca monacantha Guettarda (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
As I said, it's a fairly recent change. Thanks for doing the two additional reviews. Restoring approval per TonyTheTiger, but using the gray AGF tick, since the key hook fact is dependent on an offline source. BlueMoonset (talk) 05:21, 30 January 2013 (UTC)
