Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Royal Calpe Hunt"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>ACP2011
imported>VanishedUser kfljdfjsg33k
(reviewed 1)
Line 23: Line 23:
 
; Per the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options]], Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
 
; Per the discussion at [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options]], Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any [[WP:COI|conflict of interest]] or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
  
:*'''Review 1''':
+
:*'''Review 1''': [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. Non-promotional, and no evidence of COI. Interesting hook, AGF on whether it's supported by the two sources given. <span style="font: Tahoma, Arial, San-Serif; font-size: 8pt;">'''&tilde;[[User:Danjel|danjel]]'''&nbsp;[&nbsp;[[User_talk:Danjel|talk]]&nbsp;&#124;&nbsp;[[Special:Contributions/Danjel|contribs]]&nbsp;]</span> 17:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
 
:*<!--Make first review here-->
 
:*<!--Make first review here-->
  

Revision as of 17:35, 27 December 2012

Royal Calpe Hunt

Royal Calpe Hunt

Created/expanded by ACP2011 (talk). Self nom at 14:22, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Per the discussion at Wikipedia talk:Did you know/GibraltarPediA Options, Gibraltar-related articles are temporarily being reviewed by two individuals. In addition to the regular DYK criteria, at least one reviewer should also indicate whether they perceive any conflict of interest or promotional concerns about the article under review.IP addresses and Victuallers are not allowed to do the reviews.
  • Review 1: Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go. Non-promotional, and no evidence of COI. Interesting hook, AGF on whether it's supported by the two sources given. ˜danjel [ talk | contribs ] 17:35, 27 December 2012 (UTC)
  • Review 2: