Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Sabinoso Wilderness"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Epicgenius
(tick off some more)
imported>Epicgenius
(oops)
Line 38: Line 38:
 
|hookcited    = y
 
|hookcited    = y
 
|hookinterest = y
 
|hookinterest = y
|hookother    = y
+
|hookother    =  
 
|picfree      = y
 
|picfree      = y
 
|picused      = y
 
|picused      = y

Revision as of 00:41, 17 March 2017

Sabinoso Wilderness

Current plan to make the Sabinoso Wilderness publicly accessible
Current plan to make the Sabinoso Wilderness publicly accessible
  • ... that the Sabinoso Wilderness is 16,030 acres of federally protected land in Arizona that is inaccessible to the public, because it is completely surrounded by privately owned property? Source:Albuquerque Journal, US DOI BLM
    • ALT1:... that the 16,030 acres of federal land in Arizona's Sabinoso Wilderness is inaccessible without trespassing, because it is entirely enclosed in privately owned property?
    • ALT2:... that the Sabinoso Wilderness is 16,030 acres of federally protected land in New Mexico that is inaccessible to the public, because it is completely surrounded by privately owned property?
    • ALT3:... that the 16,030 acres of federal land in New Mexico's Sabinoso Wilderness is inaccessible without trespassing, because it is entirely enclosed in privately owned property?

Created by Timothyjosephwood (talk) and Smallchief (talk). Nominated by Timothyjosephwood (talk) at 18:22, 15 March 2017 (UTC).

  • Sabinoso is in New Mexico, not in Arizona. Smallchief (talk 01:04, 16 March 2017 (UTC):

Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.

  • Template:Re As Template:U mentioned, there are problems with the hook, namely that the wilderness is in NM rather than AZ. So how about ALT2 and ALT3, which I have posted above? Personally, I prefer ALT3 over ALT2. Also, just so we are clear on this revision to the hook, I will need to strike ALT0 and ALT1. epicgenius (talk) 01:27, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Hah. Yeah. That's a silly mistake on my part. TimothyJosephWood 09:55, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
Also yes, I think I prefer 3 as well. It is in fact accessible, just not "technically legally accessible," at least not without a helicopter, which for all that's worth is as good as inaccessible, at least from the perspective of the BLM. TimothyJosephWood 12:46, 16 March 2017 (UTC)
OK. When this review is over and any issues are resolved, I'll ask that ALT3 be the hook that is submitted. epicgenius (talk) 18:35, 16 March 2017 (UTC)