Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Sadhana Shivdasani"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr
imported>Dharmadhyaksha
Line 30: Line 30:
 
**Hmm....I see. This was my first nomination and i had possibly skipped the "uncited expansion" clause. But i still kept it here hoping exceptions can be made. But no problem. Thank you! --[[User:Animeshkulkarni|Animeshkulkarni]] ([[User talk:Animeshkulkarni|talk]]) 16:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 
**Hmm....I see. This was my first nomination and i had possibly skipped the "uncited expansion" clause. But i still kept it here hoping exceptions can be made. But no problem. Thank you! --[[User:Animeshkulkarni|Animeshkulkarni]] ([[User talk:Animeshkulkarni|talk]]) 16:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 
*** Thought about it on those grounds and the article had citations in it, so it can't work on those grounds. :( I've been burned on lightly sourced BLP nominations under that thinking myself. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 20:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 
*** Thought about it on those grounds and the article had citations in it, so it can't work on those grounds. :( I've been burned on lightly sourced BLP nominations under that thinking myself. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 20:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
 +
****No problem! Will hunt some one-liner stub now for next DYK's expansion. :) --[[User:Animeshkulkarni|Animeshkulkarni]] ([[User talk:Animeshkulkarni|talk]]) 15:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:54, 21 February 2012

Sadhana Shivdasani

Created/expanded by Animeshkulkarni (talk). Self nom at 15:17, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol delete vote.svg Article expansion began on 5th of February. Page size as of 12 January 2012 (last edit before expansion) was 3037 B (520 words) "readable prose size". Article size as of post expansion was 9758 B (1660 words) "readable prose size". The article had sources, so is not an eligible BLP uncited expansion. Not close enough to five fold to review the rest of it. --LauraHale (talk) 08:47, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
    • Hmm....I see. This was my first nomination and i had possibly skipped the "uncited expansion" clause. But i still kept it here hoping exceptions can be made. But no problem. Thank you! --Animeshkulkarni (talk) 16:39, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
      • Thought about it on those grounds and the article had citations in it, so it can't work on those grounds. :( I've been burned on lightly sourced BLP nominations under that thinking myself. --LauraHale (talk) 20:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
        • No problem! Will hunt some one-liner stub now for next DYK's expansion. :) --Animeshkulkarni (talk) 15:54, 21 February 2012 (UTC)