Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Sanders-Trump voters"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Maile66
(2B green ticked and approved)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 3)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Template|[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from October 2020]]|}}<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=October 2020  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]])&nbsp;22:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Sanders-Trump voters}}
 
{{DYK header|Sanders-Trump voters}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Sanders-Trump voters|Sanders-Trump voters}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Sanders-Trump voters|Sanders-Trump voters}}
<!--
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that in the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 US presidential election]], '''[[Sanders-Trump voters]]''' amounted to more than twice [[Donald Trump|Trump]]'s margin of victory in three [[U.S. state|states]]?  <small>Source: [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/sanders-voters-helped-trump-win-white-house-could-they-do-n1145306 NBC]</small>
 
* ... that in the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 US presidential election]], '''[[Sanders-Trump voters]]''' amounted to more than twice [[Donald Trump|Trump]]'s margin of victory in three [[U.S. state|states]]?  <small>Source: [https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/2020-election/sanders-voters-helped-trump-win-white-house-could-they-do-n1145306 NBC]</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Sanders-Trump voters|Bernie Sanders voters who voted for Donald Trump]]''' may have caused [[Hillary Clinton]]'s loss in the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 US presidential election]]?  <small>Source: [https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/8/24/16194086/bernie-trump-voters-study Vox]; note the word "may" in the hook which suggests it is one out of several possibilities</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':... that '''[[Sanders-Trump voters|Bernie Sanders voters who voted for Donald Trump]]''' may have caused [[Hillary Clinton]]'s loss in the [[2016 United States presidential election|2016 US presidential election]]?  <small>Source: [https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2017/8/24/16194086/bernie-trump-voters-study Vox]; note the word "may" in the hook which suggests it is one out of several possibilities</small>
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/1998 North Sumatra gubernatorial election|1998 North Sumatra gubernatorial election]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/1998 North Sumatra gubernatorial election|1998 North Sumatra gubernatorial election]]
 
<small>Created by [[User:Feminist|Feminist]] ([[User talk:Feminist|talk]]). Self-nominated at 10:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Feminist|Feminist]] ([[User talk:Feminist|talk]]). Self-nominated at 10:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Sanders-Trump voters|Feminist|subpage=Sanders-Trump voters}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article created 1 day ago, new enough, long enough (14,000s bytes), hook short and interesting, QPQ done (on my DYK :), no image used. Main hook preferred due to ALT1 being [[WP:SYNTH]] a bit (US presidential elections ''de jure'' has more than two candidates) Regards, [[User:Jeromi Mikhael|Jeromi Mikhael]] <sup>([[User talk:Jeromi Mikhael|marhata]])</sup> 07:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article created 1 day ago, new enough, long enough (14,000s bytes), hook short and interesting, QPQ done (on my DYK :), no image used. Main hook preferred due to ALT1 being [[WP:SYNTH]] a bit (US presidential elections ''de jure'' has more than two candidates) Regards, [[User:Jeromi Mikhael|Jeromi Mikhael]] <sup>([[User talk:Jeromi Mikhael|marhata]])</sup> 07:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
Line 39: Line 31:
  
 
:::*I'm unclear about all of this.  {{u|Yoninah}} your signature is on ALT2a. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 21:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 
:::*I'm unclear about all of this.  {{u|Yoninah}} your signature is on ALT2a. [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 21:54, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
::::*{{ping|Maile66}} {{u|Feminist}} suggested ALT2 and I added some more words as ALT2a. But when {{u|Kingsif}} came to review this new hook suggestion, he suggested ALT2b. I personally agree with ALT2b, as I don't think "{{tq|went for}}" is encyclopedic language. I guess I'm looking for an approval tick for ALT2b so I can promote it, as I did not write the original hook suggestion. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
+
::::*{{ping|Maile66}} {{u|Feminist}} suggested ALT2 and I added some more words as ALT2a. But when {{u|Kingsif}} came to review this new hook suggestion, he suggested ALT2b. I personally agree with ALT2b, as I don't think "{{tq|went for}}" is encyclopedic language. I guess I'm looking for an approval tick for ALT2b so I can promote it, as I did not write the original hook suggestion. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 22:41, 17 November 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 22:41, 17 November 2020 (UTC)

Sanders-Trump voters

Created by Feminist (talk). Self-nominated at 10:58, 4 October 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Article created 1 day ago, new enough, long enough (14,000s bytes), hook short and interesting, QPQ done (on my DYK :), no image used. Main hook preferred due to ALT1 being WP:SYNTH a bit (US presidential elections de jure has more than two candidates) Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 07:37, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:U, thanks for the review. Just a quick reminder: when measuring article length for DYK reviews, base the measurement on prose size, instead of the file size of the page. Installing a user script makes the process a lot faster. feminist (talk) wear a mask, you stupid bastards 14:40, 5 October 2020 (UTC)
  • Throwing another hook out because this won't be promoted for now anyway. ALT2: ... that an estimated 12% of Bernie Sanders voters went for Donald Trump in 2016? feminist (talk) | free Thailand 15:54, 2 November 2020 (UTC)
Template:ReadRegards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 00:14, 4 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg We need a review of ALT2, which seems the least complex in terms of wording. Pinging Template:U and Template:U for help here. Yoninah (talk) 20:45, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg Sourced and in article. The "went for" wording is probably clear enough, but any improvements on this by prep/queue builders would be appreciated. Kingsif (talk) 12:04, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Template:Outdent

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg REviewer needed for ALT2a. feminist (talk) | Americans, unite 04:25, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svg ALT2b: ... that an estimated 12% of those who voted for Bernie Sanders in the 2016 presidential primaries voted for Donald Trump in the general election? Kingsif (talk) 07:05, 13 November 2020 (UTC)
Ticking 2b for approval. The wording really is better than 2a. — Maile (talk) 22:16, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg ALT 2A is more preferable. Restoring tick.Regards, Jeromi Mikhael (marhata) 15:10, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg It's unclear to me why ALT2a is more preferable, as Template:Tq isn't really encyclopedic. As Template:U says he has retired from Wikipedia, we need another opinion here. Template:U or Template:U, are you available? Yoninah (talk) 21:37, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping Template:U suggested ALT2 and I added some more words as ALT2a. But when Template:U came to review this new hook suggestion, he suggested ALT2b. I personally agree with ALT2b, as I don't think "Template:Tq" is encyclopedic language. I guess I'm looking for an approval tick for ALT2b so I can promote it, as I did not write the original hook suggestion. Yoninah (talk) 22:06, 17 November 2020 (UTC)