Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Santa Cecilia Chapel"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Xwejnusgozo
(Created page with '{{subst:NewDYKnomination | article = Santa Cecilia Chapel | status = new | hook = ... that the '''Santa Cecilia Chapel''' ''(p...')
 
imported>Ritchie333
(done)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :*  -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The article was created yesterday, is clearly long enough and has no obvious copyvios. The image is CC-BY-SA 4.0 and hosted on Commons. The hook is cited to ''Kappelli Maltin'' and it is also cross-referenced in the ''[[Times of Malta]]'' and the website visitgozo.com (no idea if that's affiliated with the local tourist board or not so I'll not treat it as a super-reliable source). My only concern is does a building that was nearly destroyed in 2008 still count as "surviving" and has [[Ta' Pinu]] been established longer (albeit rebuilt), however I don't think these are sufficient concerns to not pass the hook, plus the Times source clearly shows the building pre-2008 restoration at least partially intact, so I don't believe the hook is misleading. (I haven't been to Malta for several decades so I'm out of touch with things, is [[Kinnie]] still popular?) [[User:Ritchie333|<b style="color:#7F007F">Ritchie333</b>]] [[User talk:Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(talk)</sup>]] [[Special:Contributions/Ritchie333|<sup style="color:#7F007F">(cont)</sup>]] 09:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 09:53, 9 August 2016

Santa Cecilia Chapel

View of the Santa Cecilia Chapel
View of the Santa Cecilia Chapel

Created by Xwejnusgozo (talk). Self-nominated at 19:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg The article was created yesterday, is clearly long enough and has no obvious copyvios. The image is CC-BY-SA 4.0 and hosted on Commons. The hook is cited to Kappelli Maltin and it is also cross-referenced in the Times of Malta and the website visitgozo.com (no idea if that's affiliated with the local tourist board or not so I'll not treat it as a super-reliable source). My only concern is does a building that was nearly destroyed in 2008 still count as "surviving" and has Ta' Pinu been established longer (albeit rebuilt), however I don't think these are sufficient concerns to not pass the hook, plus the Times source clearly shows the building pre-2008 restoration at least partially intact, so I don't believe the hook is misleading. (I haven't been to Malta for several decades so I'm out of touch with things, is Kinnie still popular?) Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 09:53, 9 August 2016 (UTC)