Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Saradha Group financial scandal"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>SusanLesch
(more)
imported>Legaleagle86
(edit hook 1 and response)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
-->
 
-->
{{*mp}}... that '''[[Saradha Group financial scandal]]''' is the biggest [[ponzi scam|ponzi collapse]] in India?
+
{{*mp}}... that '''[[Saradha Group financial scandal]]''' is possibly the biggest [[ponzi scam|ponzi collapse]] in India?
 
<!--  
 
<!--  
 
-->
 
-->
Line 25: Line 25:
 
:: Added reference for the largest ponzi scam in India from website ponzitracker. [http://www.ponzitracker.com/main/2013/4/25/massive-36-billion-ponzi-scheme-uncovered-in-india.html], the 10% tax hook was already referenced in the article [http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130425/jsp/frontpage/story_16825376.jsp#.UX7vnMV4800]. [[User:Legaleagle86|LegalEagle]] ([[User talk:Legaleagle86|talk]]) 10:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 
:: Added reference for the largest ponzi scam in India from website ponzitracker. [http://www.ponzitracker.com/main/2013/4/25/massive-36-billion-ponzi-scheme-uncovered-in-india.html], the 10% tax hook was already referenced in the article [http://www.telegraphindia.com/1130425/jsp/frontpage/story_16825376.jsp#.UX7vnMV4800]. [[User:Legaleagle86|LegalEagle]] ([[User talk:Legaleagle86|talk]]) 10:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] First hook. Please correct the article to use the source. It does not say this is the biggest Ponzi scheme in the history of India. It says, "If true, the scheme would be not only one of the largest schemes in India, but would rank as one of the largest in history." Second hook. Please reword the article. Currently the sentence about this tax is way too close paraphrasing of its source (it appears to be a direct quote). -[[User:SusanLesch|SusanLesch]] ([[User talk:SusanLesch|talk]]) 14:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 
:::[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] First hook. Please correct the article to use the source. It does not say this is the biggest Ponzi scheme in the history of India. It says, "If true, the scheme would be not only one of the largest schemes in India, but would rank as one of the largest in history." Second hook. Please reword the article. Currently the sentence about this tax is way too close paraphrasing of its source (it appears to be a direct quote). -[[User:SusanLesch|SusanLesch]] ([[User talk:SusanLesch|talk]]) 14:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
::::Used the word 'potentially' to emphasise that the amount lost is still speculative, paraphrased the tax sentence a bit more, pls do let me know if this suffices.[[User:Legaleagle86|LegalEagle]] ([[User talk:Legaleagle86|talk]]) 15:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 15:10, 5 May 2013

Saradha Group financial scandal

Created/expanded by Legaleagle86 (talk). Self nominated at 10:48, 1 May 2013 (UTC).

Symbol question.svg I like your hook but this fact needs inline citation for DYK (see Hook Content rule 3). -SusanLesch (talk) 00:36, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

Added reference for the largest ponzi scam in India from website ponzitracker. [1], the 10% tax hook was already referenced in the article [2]. LegalEagle (talk) 10:22, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Symbol question.svg First hook. Please correct the article to use the source. It does not say this is the biggest Ponzi scheme in the history of India. It says, "If true, the scheme would be not only one of the largest schemes in India, but would rank as one of the largest in history." Second hook. Please reword the article. Currently the sentence about this tax is way too close paraphrasing of its source (it appears to be a direct quote). -SusanLesch (talk) 14:51, 5 May 2013 (UTC)
Used the word 'potentially' to emphasise that the amount lost is still speculative, paraphrased the tax sentence a bit more, pls do let me know if this suffices.LegalEagle (talk) 15:10, 5 May 2013 (UTC)