Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Science Moms"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Dialectric (expand) |
imported>Yoninah (new reviewer needed) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
*'''Comment''' - don't use ALT2 - flawed grammar and does not give any indication of what the linked subject is. I still don't think this article should be in dyk at all as it has ongoing notability issues discussed on the article talk page, but if others support the inclusion, ALT3 is the least-bad option. [[User:Dialectric|Dialectric]] ([[User talk:Dialectric|talk]]) 16:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC) | *'''Comment''' - don't use ALT2 - flawed grammar and does not give any indication of what the linked subject is. I still don't think this article should be in dyk at all as it has ongoing notability issues discussed on the article talk page, but if others support the inclusion, ALT3 is the least-bad option. [[User:Dialectric|Dialectric]] ([[User talk:Dialectric|talk]]) 16:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC) | ||
− | + | :*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] New reviewer needed. The review should explicitly confirm that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been met. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 23:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC) | |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 23:30, 2 December 2017
DYK toolbox |
---|
Science Moms
- ...that the goal of the Science Moms documentary is to fight the anti-GMO, anti-vax, pro-alternative medicine culture affecting parents? Source: "Producer/director Newell has said: 'The goal of the movie is to provide a counter-narrative to the anti-GMO, anti-vax, pro-alternative medicine culture that has popped up in the world of parenting.'" From: https://www.csicop.org/specialarticles/show/addressing_the_fear-based_narrative_around_gmos_with_natalie_newell
- ALT1:... that the Science Moms documentary owes its existence to a group of pro-science mothers who challenged anti-GMO celebrity mothers with an open-letter? Source: "As was described in a May 19, 2017, article in Paste magazine, a group of bloggers wrote an open letter to several celebrity moms in 2015, criticizing their anti-GMO stance, and explaining the safety and benefits of GMOs... This letter caught the attention of Natalie Newell... this chain of events resulted in the production of Science Moms." From: http://groundedparents.com/2015/08/19/scientist-and-advocate-moms-to-celeb-on-gmo-food/ AND https://www.pastemagazine.com/articles/2017/05/science-moms-gmo.html
- ALT2:... what is the goal of the Science Moms documentary?
- ALT3:...that the goal of the Science Moms documentary is to fight the anti-science culture affecting parents?
Created by Rp2006 (talk). Self-nominated at 04:05, 20 November 2017 (UTC).
- Comment - the ALT1 wording relies heavily on a non-independent source; the groundedparents.com article is written by Kavin Senapathy who is featured in the documentary. Given this sourcing, this wording should not be used. Dialectric (talk) 20:36, 20 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - the hook and the ALT1 are too long in my opinion, so I've suggested ALT2. Sylwia Ufnalska (talk) 16:15, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
No problems with the article, ready for DYK. Sylwia Ufnalska (talk) 16:37, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - Oh no - please don't use ALT2.. "Do you know what is the goal of..." is not even grammatically correct! Also the original hook is within character limit, so what is the problem? If the original MUST be shortened, I suggest: ALT3 RobP (talk) 17:29, 25 November 2017 (UTC)
- Comment - don't use ALT2 - flawed grammar and does not give any indication of what the linked subject is. I still don't think this article should be in dyk at all as it has ongoing notability issues discussed on the article talk page, but if others support the inclusion, ALT3 is the least-bad option. Dialectric (talk) 16:45, 26 November 2017 (UTC)
New reviewer needed. The review should explicitly confirm that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Yoninah (talk) 23:30, 2 December 2017 (UTC)