Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Sean Royal"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Edwardx (hooks tweaked slightly) |
imported>7&6=thirteen (* '''Review''' 16px Tweaks are confirmed.) |
||
| Line 24: | Line 24: | ||
:* ''Comment'' Review under way. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 04:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC) | :* ''Comment'' Review under way. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 04:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
* '''Review''' [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go! 5X Expansion (1075 ==> 8686 characters), timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. In passing, I note that I did not have access to the offline sources, which includes the book that is one of the two references for the hook. I [[WP:AGF]]. Earwig's copy violation detector: Sean Royal report gives it a clean bill. Hooks are hooky enough, I think, and relate directly to the essence of the article. They are interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done, although article is not and probably will not be promoted (not required). I learned more about professional wrestling than I wanted to know. Nicely done! <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 14:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC) | * '''Review''' [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go! 5X Expansion (1075 ==> 8686 characters), timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. In passing, I note that I did not have access to the offline sources, which includes the book that is one of the two references for the hook. I [[WP:AGF]]. Earwig's copy violation detector: Sean Royal report gives it a clean bill. Hooks are hooky enough, I think, and relate directly to the essence of the article. They are interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done, although article is not and probably will not be promoted (not required). I learned more about professional wrestling than I wanted to know. Nicely done! <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 14:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
| + | * '''Review''' [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Tweaks are confirmed. <span style="text-shadow:#396 0.2em 0.2em 0.5em; class=texhtml">[[User:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#060">7&6=thirteen</b>]] ([[User talk:7&6=thirteen|<b style="color:#000">☎</b>]])</span> 13:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 13:36, 8 January 2016
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sean Royal
- ... that [professional wrestler]] Sean Royal was once managed by a robot...??
- ALT1:... that professional wrestler Sean Royal and Chris Champion played characters that supposedly traveled back to 1986 from 2002...?
- Reviewed: Pending, will complete asap
- Comment: Expanded the content five fold
- QPQ: reviewed Adam Dahlberg
5x expanded by MPJ-DK (talk). Self-nominated at 04:21, 7 January 2016 (UTC).
- Comment Review under way. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 04:23, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Review 16px Good to go! 5X Expansion (1075 ==> 8686 characters), timely nominated. Meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular: is neutral; cites sources with inline citations; is free of close paraphrasing issues, copyright violations and plagiarism. DYK nomination was timely and article is easily long enough. Every paragraph is cited. In passing, I note that I did not have access to the offline sources, which includes the book that is one of the two references for the hook. I WP:AGF. Earwig's copy violation detector: Sean Royal report gives it a clean bill. Hooks are hooky enough, I think, and relate directly to the essence of the article. They are interesting, decently neutral, and appropriately cited. QPQ done, although article is not and probably will not be promoted (not required). I learned more about professional wrestling than I wanted to know. Nicely done! 7&6=thirteen (☎) 14:53, 7 January 2016 (UTC)
- Review 16px Tweaks are confirmed. 7&6=thirteen (☎) 13:36, 8 January 2016 (UTC)
