Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Sex Life of Robots"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492 (re) |
imported>Mandarax m (rm pictured) |
||
| Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | {{*mp}}... that the [[animated]] [[short film]] '''''[[Sex Life of Robots]]''' | + | {{*mp}}... that the [[animated]] [[short film]] '''''[[Sex Life of Robots]]''''', showing sexual activity among [[robot]]s, is described as "[[Art film|art]]-[[porn]]"? |
<!-- | <!-- | ||
--> | --> | ||
Revision as of 09:43, 8 April 2012
Sex Life of Robots
- ... that the animated short film Sex Life of Robots, showing sexual activity among robots, is described as "art-porn"?
- Reviewed: Sukumar Barman
Created/expanded by SupernovaExplosion (talk). Self nom at 13:29, 6 April 2012 (UTC)
Length, history, source, interest all look good. The only issue is, I think the image, despite tagging, is fair use like most movie stills. That needn't hold up the hook, but whoever picks the image should probably look at that.--Wehwalt (talk) 12:03, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Well, I found the image at Flickr where it is uploaded with a CC license. The author is Cristian Eslava. --SupernovaExplosion Talk 12:10, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
That's very shaky ground, as the person may or may not have the copyright to the film (if I post a screenshot of Jerry McGuire under a CC license, that doesn't mean I can legally do so). Unless the image's CC status is verified, I don't think this should pass with the images. Crisco 1492 (talk) 12:20, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
- Well, since it is not possible to know the exact copyright status, I've removed the images and nominated my uploaded photos in commons for speedy. Lets feature the hook without image. --SupernovaExplosion Talk 17:26, 7 April 2012 (UTC)
Alright, sounds good. Tick based on previous review. Crisco 1492 (talk) 22:50, 7 April 2012 (UTC)