Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Seycellesa, Traklosia"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Kevmin
imported>Kevmin
Line 21: Line 21:
  
 
:*Starting review--[[User:Kevmin|<span style="color: #120A8F;">Kev</span>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<span style="color: #228B22;">min</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 21:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 
:*Starting review--[[User:Kevmin|<span style="color: #120A8F;">Kev</span>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<span style="color: #228B22;">min</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 21:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
 
+
::*[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] Articles both long enough and expansion/creation new enough.  The hook is supported in both articles and both cited to sources regarding Synonymy.  No policy issues identified in the articles, with citations for all paragraphs and no copyvio issues identifiable.  References not in English taken AGF.  Looks good to go.--[[User:Kevmin|<span style="color: #120A8F;">Kev</span>]][[User talk:Kevmin|<span style="color: #228B22;">min</span>]] [[Special:Contributions/Kevmin|§]] 00:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC) 
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 00:15, 20 February 2018

Seycellesa, Traklosia

  • ... that the spider genus Seycellesa and the nematode genus Traklosia were both originally named Robertia, but they had to be renamed? Source: "The spider name Robertia recently was replaced with Seycellesa Kocak & Kemal, 2008. The nematode genus-name also is a junior homonym and requires replacement. We propose the new replacement name Traklosia for Robertia Travassos & Kloss, 1961." doi:10.11646/zootaxa.4052.4.6Template:Only in print

5x expanded by Umimmak (talk). Self-nominated at 09:22, 18 February 2018 (UTC).

  • Starting review--Kevmin § 21:16, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
  • Symbol voting keep.svg Articles both long enough and expansion/creation new enough. The hook is supported in both articles and both cited to sources regarding Synonymy. No policy issues identified in the articles, with citations for all paragraphs and no copyvio issues identifiable. References not in English taken AGF. Looks good to go.--Kevmin § 00:15, 20 February 2018 (UTC)