Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Shamus: Case II"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>23W (forgot icon) |
imported>4meter4 (in prep 5) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from November 2015]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
− | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
− | + | ||
− | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:4meter4|4meter4]] ([[User talk:4meter4|talk]]) 06:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Shamus: Case II==== | ====Shamus: Case II==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Shamus: Case II|Shamus: Case II}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Shamus: Case II|Shamus: Case II}} | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
* ... that one reviewer liked '''''[[Shamus: Case II]]''''' so much that they suggested rushing out and buying it to ensure there would be another sequel? | * ... that one reviewer liked '''''[[Shamus: Case II]]''''' so much that they suggested rushing out and buying it to ensure there would be another sequel? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Second Thoughts are Best]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Second Thoughts are Best]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]). Self-nominated at 14:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]). Self-nominated at 14:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC).</small> | ||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | |||
− | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | + | :* {{Reply to|Maury Markowitz}} [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New, long enough, no [http://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=Shamus%3A+Case+II&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=0&use_links=1 close paraphrasing], [[Template:Did you know nominations/Second Thoughts are Best|QPQ]] is valid. Good work! There's something about articles on forgotten games that make them fun to read—even more when they're well-researched like this. [[User:23W|23W]] 01:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 06:12, 26 November 2015
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by 4meter4 (talk) 06:12, 26 November 2015 (UTC)
DYK toolbox |
---|
Shamus: Case II
- ... that one reviewer liked Shamus: Case II so much that they suggested rushing out and buying it to ensure there would be another sequel?
- Reviewed: Second Thoughts are Best
Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 14:18, 10 November 2015 (UTC).
- Template:Reply to
New, long enough, no close paraphrasing, QPQ is valid. Good work! There's something about articles on forgotten games that make them fun to read—even more when they're well-researched like this. 23W 01:10, 25 November 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Reply to