Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Shell growth in estuaries"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Guettarda
(looks good)
imported>BlueMoonset
(promoted to prep 2)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
{{#if:yes|<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from January 2013]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=January 2013
+
:''The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span>  Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page.  '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no-->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 00:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)<br />}}
 
====Shell growth in estuaries====
 
====Shell growth in estuaries====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Shell growth in estuaries|Shell growth in estuaries}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Shell growth in estuaries|Shell growth in estuaries}}
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
<div style="float:right;margin-left:0.5em;">
 
[[File:Rainbow over the Mawddach estuary - geograph.org.uk - 601120.jpg|100x100px|Mawddach estuary]]
 
[[File:Rainbow over the Mawddach estuary - geograph.org.uk - 601120.jpg|100x100px|Mawddach estuary]]
</div><!-- 
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
{{*mp}}... that temperature and [[salinity]] variations produced by ocean tides and freshwater rivers in [[estuaries]] ''(pictured)'' make them ideal [[habitat]]s for studying how these factors affect the '''[[Shell growth in estuaries|growth of shells]]'''?
 
{{*mp}}... that temperature and [[salinity]] variations produced by ocean tides and freshwater rivers in [[estuaries]] ''(pictured)'' make them ideal [[habitat]]s for studying how these factors affect the '''[[Shell growth in estuaries|growth of shells]]'''?
<!--
 
-->
 
 
<small>Created  by [[User:Isthatfog|Isthatfog]] ([[User talk:Isthatfog|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Epipelagic|Epipelagic]] ([[User talk:Epipelagic|talk]]) at 07:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)</small>
 
<small>Created  by [[User:Isthatfog|Isthatfog]] ([[User talk:Isthatfog|talk]]).  Nominated by [[User:Epipelagic|Epipelagic]] ([[User talk:Epipelagic|talk]]) at 07:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)</small>
<!--
 
*{{DYKmake|Shell growth in estuaries|137.99.198.166}}
 
*{{DYKmake|Shell growth in estuaries|Isthatfog}}
 
*{{DYKnom|Shell growth in estuaries|Epipelagic}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Article looks good although it's origin (an essay-like AFC submission) gave me pause. Nonetheless, the original text does not appear to be a copyvio and Epipelagic's top-to-bottom workover of the article was excellent. Spot-checked refs (including several applying directly to the hook) look OK, and I feel confident of the overall quality given Epipelagic's thorough work-over of the article. Age, length, hook all check out. [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 16:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Pictogram voting keep.svg|16px]] Article looks good although it's origin (an essay-like AFC submission) gave me pause. Nonetheless, the original text does not appear to be a copyvio and Epipelagic's top-to-bottom workover of the article was excellent. Spot-checked refs (including several applying directly to the hook) look OK, and I feel confident of the overall quality given Epipelagic's thorough work-over of the article. Age, length, hook all check out. [[User:Guettarda|Guettarda]] ([[User talk:Guettarda|talk]]) 16:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
  
  
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}{{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 00:33, 17 January 2013

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by BlueMoonset (talk) 00:33, 17 January 2013 (UTC)

Shell growth in estuaries

Mawddach estuary

Created by Isthatfog (talk). Nominated by Epipelagic (talk) at 07:26, 11 January 2013 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article looks good although it's origin (an essay-like AFC submission) gave me pause. Nonetheless, the original text does not appear to be a copyvio and Epipelagic's top-to-bottom workover of the article was excellent. Spot-checked refs (including several applying directly to the hook) look OK, and I feel confident of the overall quality given Epipelagic's thorough work-over of the article. Age, length, hook all check out. Guettarda (talk) 16:29, 14 January 2013 (UTC)