Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Shinsarugakuki"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492
(c.e. hook)
imported>Sgconlaw
(Reviewed article and hook)
Line 11: Line 11:
 
-->
 
-->
 
{{*mp}}... that the '''[[Shinsarugakuki]]''', written in the mid 11th century, provides an insight into Chinese trade at the time, as well as accounts of comic sketches, lion dances, puppets, rice-planting songs, and solo [[Sumo|sumo wrestling]]?
 
{{*mp}}... that the '''[[Shinsarugakuki]]''', written in the mid 11th century, provides an insight into Chinese trade at the time, as well as accounts of comic sketches, lion dances, puppets, rice-planting songs, and solo [[Sumo|sumo wrestling]]?
 +
{{*mp}}'''ALT 1''': ... that the mid-11th-century [[Japan]]ese fictional work '''''[[Shinsarugakuki]]''''' provides insights into Chinese trade, comic sketches, [[lion dance]]s, puppets, rice-planting songs, and solo [[sumo|sumo wrestling]]?
 
<!--
 
<!--
 
-->
 
-->
Line 21: Line 22:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:*<!--Make first comment here-->
+
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The article is of sufficient length and appears to be properly referenced. The hook is referenced by footnotes 2 and 3. However, at 215 characters it's too long. See "ALT 1" for a shorter alternative that I wrote. — [[User:Smuconlaw|SMUconlaw]] ([[User talk:Smuconlaw|talk]]) 19:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)
 
 
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 19:15, 1 November 2012

Shinsarugakuki

  • ... that the Shinsarugakuki, written in the mid 11th century, provides an insight into Chinese trade at the time, as well as accounts of comic sketches, lion dances, puppets, rice-planting songs, and solo sumo wrestling?

Created/expanded by Dr. Blofeld (talk), Rosiestep (talk), Nvvchar (talk). Nominated by Nvvchar (talk) at 19:52, 22 October 2012 (UTC)

  • Symbol confirmed.svg The article is of sufficient length and appears to be properly referenced. The hook is referenced by footnotes 2 and 3. However, at 215 characters it's too long. See "ALT 1" for a shorter alternative that I wrote. — SMUconlaw (talk) 19:15, 1 November 2012 (UTC)