Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Single subject amendment"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>EEng (Ce) |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 2) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from July 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Single subject amendment==== | ====Single subject amendment==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Single subject amendment|Single subject amendment}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Single subject amendment|Single subject amendment}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that 41 U.S. states follow the [[single-subject rule]] for legislation, and a '''[[Single subject amendment|proposed constitutional amendment]]''' would extend it to the federal government as well? | * ... that 41 U.S. states follow the [[single-subject rule]] for legislation, and a '''[[Single subject amendment|proposed constitutional amendment]]''' would extend it to the federal government as well? | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Post-truth politics|Did you know nominations/Post-truth politics]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Post-truth politics|Did you know nominations/Post-truth politics]] | ||
<small>Created by [[User:Antony-22|Antony-22]] ([[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]). Self-nominated at 23:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC).</small> | <small>Created by [[User:Antony-22|Antony-22]] ([[User talk:Antony-22|talk]]). Self-nominated at 23:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | + | :*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Meets the criteria. Was created 29 July, just over the minimum length, fully cited and well written. All facts in article (including the hook) are cited and check back to the sources, which are reliable. No noticeable close paraphrasing (a couple of phrases are similar to [https://www.fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R44435.pdf this source] but I think they are largely unavoidable). QPQ carried out - [[User:Dumelow|Dumelow]] ([[User talk:Dumelow|talk]]) 12:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | |
Latest revision as of 05:25, 4 August 2016
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:25, 4 August 2016 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Single subject amendment
- ... that 41 U.S. states follow the single-subject rule for legislation, and a proposed constitutional amendment would extend it to the federal government as well?
Created by Antony-22 (talk). Self-nominated at 23:53, 29 July 2016 (UTC).
Meets the criteria. Was created 29 July, just over the minimum length, fully cited and well written. All facts in article (including the hook) are cited and check back to the sources, which are reliable. No noticeable close paraphrasing (a couple of phrases are similar to this source but I think they are largely unavoidable). QPQ carried out - Dumelow (talk) 12:43, 30 July 2016 (UTC)