Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Sodder children disappearance"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yoninah (r) |
imported>Yoninah (few issues) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
:* I added the article into [[Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/December 24]]. If it features this article into the Main Page as part of OTD, the article will no longer be eligible for DYK. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 20:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC) | :* I added the article into [[Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/December 24]]. If it features this article into the Main Page as part of OTD, the article will no longer be eligible for DYK. [[User:George Ho|George Ho]] ([[User talk:George Ho|talk]]) 20:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
::{{ping|George Ho}} why would you do something like that? Do you think that every article tied to a date has to be included in Selected Anniversaries? Your decisions on DYK hooks are becoming [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]]. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC) | ::{{ping|George Ho}} why would you do something like that? Do you think that every article tied to a date has to be included in Selected Anniversaries? Your decisions on DYK hooks are becoming [[Wikipedia:Disruptive editing|disruptive]]. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 21:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | :::*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Excellent work, as always. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. A few comments: | ||
| + | :::*Why isn't this called [[Disappearance of Sodder children]] in keeping with other page titles? | ||
| + | :::*IMO all of the hooks are wordy and clunky. Please also remember that the majority of hooks on December 24 will be about Christmas, so maybe this hook shouldn't be so graphic. Could you offer another suggestion? | ||
| + | :::*The QPQ is not a full review. Reviews should explicitly confirm that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been met. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC) | ||
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 22:59, 19 December 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sodder children disappearance
- ... that the bodies of five of the Sodder children were allegedly never found after a fire today destroyed their Fayetteville, West Virginia, home 70 years ago today, leading their family to believe they were still alive somewhere?
- ALT1:... that the Fayetteville, West Virginia, fire chief planted a beef liver in the ashes of George Sodder's house allegedly to convince him his five missing children had actually died in the fire 70 years ago today?
- ALT2:... that a billboard the Sodder family of Fayetteville, West Virginia, put up on a local highway seeking information on five of their children who allegedly disappeared 70 years ago today remained up until 1989?
- ALT3:... that a photo (pictured) mailed to the Sodder family of Fayetteville, West Virginia, in 1968 is believed by them to be of one of five children unaccounted for after a fire destroyed their home 70 years ago today?
- Reviewed: Real ear measurement
- Comment: As the hooks suggest I have again created this with a date in mind ... December 24, the 70th anniversary of the fire.
Created by Daniel Case (talk). Self-nominated at 17:52, 8 December 2015 (UTC).
- I added the article into Wikipedia:Selected anniversaries/December 24. If it features this article into the Main Page as part of OTD, the article will no longer be eligible for DYK. George Ho (talk) 20:15, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping why would you do something like that? Do you think that every article tied to a date has to be included in Selected Anniversaries? Your decisions on DYK hooks are becoming disruptive. Yoninah (talk) 21:59, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
Excellent work, as always. New enough, long enough, neutrally written, well referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. A few comments:- Why isn't this called Disappearance of Sodder children in keeping with other page titles?
- IMO all of the hooks are wordy and clunky. Please also remember that the majority of hooks on December 24 will be about Christmas, so maybe this hook shouldn't be so graphic. Could you offer another suggestion?
- The QPQ is not a full review. Reviews should explicitly confirm that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Yoninah (talk) 22:58, 19 December 2015 (UTC)
