Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Sol-20"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Maury Markowitz
imported>BlueMoonset
(putting up icon to attract other reviewers)
Line 28: Line 28:
  
 
'''3rd opinion please''' [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 00:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 
'''3rd opinion please''' [[User:Maury Markowitz|Maury Markowitz]] ([[User talk:Maury Markowitz|talk]]) 00:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)
 +
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Adding call for additional opinion on sourcing and other DYK requirements. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 14:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
  
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 14:37, 26 August 2018

Sol-20

Sol-20
Sol-20
  • ... that the Sol-20 was "the first complete small computer under $1,000"? Source: see text, from their otiginal ads

Created by Maury Markowitz (talk). Self-nominated at 18:17, 16 July 2018 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg Some of the statements in the article (such as "The Sol-PC and Sol-10 were largely forgotten" and "building an order backlog that took a year to fill") are only mentioned in the lead, and do not have citations. The article also uses peacock words such as "unfortunately". And since the product is American, the article should ideally use MDY as opposed to DMY. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 00:17, 1 August 2018 (UTC)
These are fine comments, but not part of the DYK. The question for this page is whether or not the article meets the DYK requirements. Maury Markowitz (talk) 12:24, 10 August 2018 (UTC)
Yes, but those are still article issues and they need to be addressed before the rest of the review can proceed. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 02:06, 12 August 2018 (UTC)

No, they don't. If that is not clear, please ask for a 3rd opinion, this has been on this list long enough. Maury Markowitz (talk) 22:53, 16 August 2018 (UTC)

Template:Ping In that case, the article does not currently meet the DYK criteria due to the unsourced statements, as DYK states that candidates "meets core policies and guidelines, and in particular... cites sources with inline citations". If you wish for the nomination to pass, additional citations need to be provided. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 08:50, 18 August 2018 (UTC)

Reviewed Hugh Martell. Maury Markowitz (talk) 21:15, 10 August 2018 (UTC)

3rd opinion please Maury Markowitz (talk) 00:10, 20 August 2018 (UTC)

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Adding call for additional opinion on sourcing and other DYK requirements. BlueMoonset (talk) 14:36, 26 August 2018 (UTC)