Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/South Audley Street"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Klbrain
("a queen" is not the "the Queen")
imported>Miraclepine
(good to go!)
Line 19: Line 19:
  
 
:* Comment: ''the Queen'' is misleading to readers, and therefore fails accuracy. [[Caroline of Brunswick]] was certainly ''a queen'' (or queen consort), but readers wouldn't associate her with ''the Queen''. Methinks the self-nomination might have more to do with a reversal of an unopposed year-old merge proposal on [[South Audley Street]].
 
:* Comment: ''the Queen'' is misleading to readers, and therefore fails accuracy. [[Caroline of Brunswick]] was certainly ''a queen'' (or queen consort), but readers wouldn't associate her with ''the Queen''. Methinks the self-nomination might have more to do with a reversal of an unopposed year-old merge proposal on [[South Audley Street]].
 
+
:Let's see: 2014 prose bytes, expanded just today, no copyvios detected, AGF the offline sources, article is neutral, sufficient inline citations. If we can use a more accurate hook like this:
 +
*'''ALT1''': ... that [[Caroline of Brunswick|a queen]] briefly lived at 77 '''[[South Audley Street]]'''?  <small>Source: "Queen Caroline was at No. 77 for a short while on her return from Italy in 1820" (''[[The London Encyclopedia]]'' 3rd edition, 2008, p. 851)</small>
 +
:[[File:Symbol voting keep.svg|16px]] With that, good to go! [[User:Miraclepine|ミラ]][[User talk:Miraclepine|P]] 02:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 02:04, 27 October 2019

South Audley Street

5x expanded by Ritchie333 (talk). Self-nominated at 11:19, 26 October 2019 (UTC).

  • Comment: the Queen is misleading to readers, and therefore fails accuracy. Caroline of Brunswick was certainly a queen (or queen consort), but readers wouldn't associate her with the Queen. Methinks the self-nomination might have more to do with a reversal of an unopposed year-old merge proposal on South Audley Street.
Let's see: 2014 prose bytes, expanded just today, no copyvios detected, AGF the offline sources, article is neutral, sufficient inline citations. If we can use a more accurate hook like this:
Symbol voting keep.svg With that, good to go! ミラP 02:04, 27 October 2019 (UTC)