Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/St Nidan's Church, Llanidan"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Harrison49
(Accepted for prep 3)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
Line 12: Line 12:
  
 
-->
 
-->
{{*mp}}... that one 19th-century writer condemned the partial demolition of '''[[Old Church of St Nidan, Llanidan|the old church]]''' dedicated to '''[[Nidan|St Nidan]]''' in Anglesey, Wales, saying that '''[[St Nidan's Church, Llanidan|its replacement]]''' ''(pictured)'' was "a painfully impressive example of architectural bad taste"?
+
*... that one 19th-century writer condemned the partial demolition of '''[[Old Church of St Nidan, Llanidan|the old church]]''' dedicated to '''[[Nidan|St Nidan]]''' in Anglesey, Wales, saying that '''[[St Nidan's Church, Llanidan|its replacement]]''' ''(pictured)'' was "a painfully impressive example of architectural bad taste"?
 
<!--
 
<!--
 
-->
 
-->

Latest revision as of 22:42, 7 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: accepted by Harrison49 (talk) 21:24, 27 November 2011 (UTC)

St Nidan's Church, Llanidan, Old Church of St Nidan, Llanidan, Nidan

St Nidan's Church, Llanidan

  • ... that one 19th-century writer condemned the partial demolition of the old church dedicated to St Nidan in Anglesey, Wales, saying that its replacement (pictured) was "a painfully impressive example of architectural bad taste"?

Created/expanded by Bencherlite (talk). Self nom at 10:05, 5 November 2011 (UTC)

  • NB all three articles have been passed as GAs since this DYK nomination began. BencherliteTalk 15:11, 21 November 2011 (UTC)
  • Symbol confirmed.svg All three article are plenty long enough (15473, 3786 and 8349 characters), and were all moved to mainspace on November 4, 2011. The hook reference checks out fine in the third article, but isn't mentioned in either of the first two. I have no overall concern with this, but it might be worth mentioning in the article in the old church anyway? Spotchecks carried out on the online references reveal no copyvio or close paraphrasing concerns. Good to go. Harrias talk 19:21, 26 November 2011 (UTC)