Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Stafanie Taylor"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SporkBot m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content) |
imported>Jonesey95 |
||
Line 12: | Line 12: | ||
:* Hook fine, verified. | :* Hook fine, verified. | ||
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Two QPQsd required for double-barrel hook. [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 10:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] Two QPQsd required for double-barrel hook. [[User:Hawkeye7|Hawkeye7]] ([[User talk:Hawkeye7|talk]]) 10:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | ::*I believe that it is recommended that two QPQs are completed for a double hook, not required. I'm sure I will do another review in the mean time, but unless policy has changed it isn't necessary. '''[[User:Harrias|< | + | ::*I believe that it is recommended that two QPQs are completed for a double hook, not required. I'm sure I will do another review in the mean time, but unless policy has changed it isn't necessary. '''[[User:Harrias|<span style="color:#00cc33;">Harrias</span>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900;">talk</span>]]</sup> 12:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC) |
:::*Everything is fine in terms of date length and ref, but a 2nd QPQ is requried. --[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 03:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC) | :::*Everything is fine in terms of date length and ref, but a 2nd QPQ is requried. --[[User:TonyTheTiger|TonyTheTiger]] <small>([[User talk:TonyTheTiger|T]]/[[Special:Contributions/TonyTheTiger|C]]/[[User:TonyTheTiger/Antonio Vernon|BIO]]/[[WP:CHICAGO]]/[[WP:FOUR]]) </small> 03:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | ::::*To quote the [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines|Supplementary guidelines]]: ''"H4: Where hooks have more than one new or expanded article, there is no consensus whether an article-for-article or hook-for-hook QPQ is required. An article-for-article review is encouraged, but a hook-for-hook review is acceptable."'' '''[[User:Harrias|< | + | ::::*To quote the [[Wikipedia:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines|Supplementary guidelines]]: ''"H4: Where hooks have more than one new or expanded article, there is no consensus whether an article-for-article or hook-for-hook QPQ is required. An article-for-article review is encouraged, but a hook-for-hook review is acceptable."'' '''[[User:Harrias|<span style="color:#00cc33;">Harrias</span>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900;">talk</span>]]</sup> 06:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC) |
− | {{od|:::::}}[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] If QPQ was the only outstanding issue, then it's good to go. '''< | + | {{od|:::::}}[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] If QPQ was the only outstanding issue, then it's good to go. '''[[User:Schwede66|<span style="color:#000000;">Schwede</span>]][[User talk:Schwede66|<span style="color:#FF4500;">66</span>]]''' 21:26, 24 May 2012 (UTC) |
*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The [[ICC Women's Cricketer of the Year]] article does not have any citations in its third paragraph. DYK rules require at least one citation per paragraph, and that the material in each paragraph is sourced in that paragraph. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] The [[ICC Women's Cricketer of the Year]] article does not have any citations in its third paragraph. DYK rules require at least one citation per paragraph, and that the material in each paragraph is sourced in that paragraph. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 03:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC) | ||
− | :*{{DYK?again}} That should be sorted now. '''[[User:Harrias|< | + | :*{{DYK?again}} That should be sorted now. '''[[User:Harrias|<span style="color:#00cc33;">Harrias</span>]]''' <sup>[[User_talk:Harrias|<span style="color:#009900;">talk</span>]]</sup> 20:11, 29 May 2012 (UTC) |
::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. - [[User:Presidentman|Presidentman]] [[User talk:Presidentman|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Presidentman|contribs]] [[User:Presidentman/potd|Random Picture of the Day]] ([[WP:TBACK|Talkback]]) 22:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ::*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. - [[User:Presidentman|Presidentman]] [[User talk:Presidentman|talk]] · [[Special:Contributions/Presidentman|contribs]] [[User:Presidentman/potd|Random Picture of the Day]] ([[WP:TBACK|Talkback]]) 22:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC){{#if:yes|</div></noinclude>|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template talk:Did you know/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]|{{#ifeq:{{FULLPAGENAME}}|Template:Did you know nominations/{{SUBPAGENAME}}|[[Category:Pending DYK nominations]]}}}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Latest revision as of 20:27, 30 January 2019
- The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 22:11, 31 May 2012 (UTC)
Stafanie Taylor, ICC Women's Cricketer of the Year
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: Stafanie Taylor
- ICC Women's Cricketer of the Year )
- ... that Stafanie Taylor, the 2011 ICC Women's Cricketer of the Year, is the only player to have scored half-centuries in three consecutive Twenty20 Internationals?
- Reviewed: Sukumar Barman
Created/expanded by Harrias (talk). Self nom at 16:22, 19 May 2012 (UTC)
- Articles big enough, long enough (one only just)
- Hook fine, verified.
Two QPQsd required for double-barrel hook. Hawkeye7 (talk) 10:18, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- I believe that it is recommended that two QPQs are completed for a double hook, not required. I'm sure I will do another review in the mean time, but unless policy has changed it isn't necessary. Harrias talk 12:10, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
- Everything is fine in terms of date length and ref, but a 2nd QPQ is requried. --TonyTheTiger (T/C/BIO/WP:CHICAGO/WP:FOUR) 03:11, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
- To quote the Supplementary guidelines: "H4: Where hooks have more than one new or expanded article, there is no consensus whether an article-for-article or hook-for-hook QPQ is required. An article-for-article review is encouraged, but a hook-for-hook review is acceptable." Harrias talk 06:26, 22 May 2012 (UTC)
Template:Od If QPQ was the only outstanding issue, then it's good to go. Schwede66 21:26, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
The ICC Women's Cricketer of the Year article does not have any citations in its third paragraph. DYK rules require at least one citation per paragraph, and that the material in each paragraph is sourced in that paragraph. BlueMoonset (talk) 03:59, 25 May 2012 (UTC)
-
Good to go. - Presidentman talk · contribs Random Picture of the Day (Talkback) 22:10, 31 May 2012 (UTC)