Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Star Trek: Insurrection"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Miyagawa
(Replied.)
imported>BlueMoonset
(status report needed)
Line 33: Line 33:
 
:*It will take a while to properly look through even a sampling of the article, but a suggestion (also for the GAN) would be a copyedit, as I found some things even in the lead to improve [[User:Chris857|Chris857]] ([[User talk:Chris857|talk]]) 03:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 
:*It will take a while to properly look through even a sampling of the article, but a suggestion (also for the GAN) would be a copyedit, as I found some things even in the lead to improve [[User:Chris857|Chris857]] ([[User talk:Chris857|talk]]) 03:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 
::*You're right. I've de-GAN'ed it for now and instead nominated it at the Guild of Copy Editors. It seemed an easy expansion initially because First Contact was 60,000+ characters. But frankly, if I hadn't stumbled across the Michael Piller book online then this would have been stuck around the 30,000 mark. I wouldn't expect to see any other ST films here soon - Nemesis and Generations are both already above 12,000 characters and so it would be difficult to get them to reach a 5x expansion point without some serious padding. [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 09:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 
::*You're right. I've de-GAN'ed it for now and instead nominated it at the Guild of Copy Editors. It seemed an easy expansion initially because First Contact was 60,000+ characters. But frankly, if I hadn't stumbled across the Michael Piller book online then this would have been stuck around the 30,000 mark. I wouldn't expect to see any other ST films here soon - Nemesis and Generations are both already above 12,000 characters and so it would be difficult to get them to reach a 5x expansion point without some serious padding. [[User:Miyagawa|Miyagawa]] ([[User talk:Miyagawa|talk]]) 09:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
 +
 +
:::*It's been well over two weeks without any further action. Is this article still awaiting the abovementioned copyedit? How soon will it be ready for a final DYK review, or is it ready now? [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 04:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)
 +
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 04:22, 10 April 2013

Star Trek: Insurrection

Armin Shimmerman (left) and Max Grodénchik (right)

  • Comment: Expanded from 6930 to 34926, a 5.04x expansion. Image is for the alt hook.

5x expanded by Miyagawa (talk). Self nominated at 22:03, 22 March 2013 (UTC).

  • First off, how the heck could this article ever be a DYK?!?!
  • Anyway, 5.038x expansion to ~35000 characters prose
  • (caveat, looking back, the article has been longer in the past, up to 8707 chars, meaning only a 4x expansion, but I am willing to IAR since it is so awesome to have this article at DYK) Chris857 (talk) 03:40, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
  • Files appropriately licensed (one fair-use poster), including the one suggested for the hook
  • Cited inline, to apparently reliable sources (and books!)
  • It will take a while to properly look through even a sampling of the article, but a suggestion (also for the GAN) would be a copyedit, as I found some things even in the lead to improve Chris857 (talk) 03:30, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
  • You're right. I've de-GAN'ed it for now and instead nominated it at the Guild of Copy Editors. It seemed an easy expansion initially because First Contact was 60,000+ characters. But frankly, if I hadn't stumbled across the Michael Piller book online then this would have been stuck around the 30,000 mark. I wouldn't expect to see any other ST films here soon - Nemesis and Generations are both already above 12,000 characters and so it would be difficult to get them to reach a 5x expansion point without some serious padding. Miyagawa (talk) 09:46, 23 March 2013 (UTC)
  • It's been well over two weeks without any further action. Is this article still awaiting the abovementioned copyedit? How soon will it be ready for a final DYK review, or is it ready now? BlueMoonset (talk) 04:22, 10 April 2013 (UTC)