Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Sumac (band)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(QPQ not complete)
imported>Malconfort
(reply)
Line 27: Line 27:
 
::::*Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] and [[Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds]].--[[User:Malconfort|''malconfort'']] ([[User talk:Malconfort|talk]]) 05:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 
::::*Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] and [[Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds]].--[[User:Malconfort|''malconfort'']] ([[User talk:Malconfort|talk]]) 05:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 
:::::*{{ping|Malconfort}} I'm sorry the [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]] rule is confusing. It just means that for every article you submit for DYK, you also submit a review of someone else's DYK article nomination. Since you are only nominating one article, [[Sumac (band)]], you only need to submit one QPQ. Save the others for your next nomination. However, your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] is not complete; you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been covered. Your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds]] is also not a review, just a suggestion for the hook. Perhaps you could flesh out your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] as a QPQ for this Sumac nomination. Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 10:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 
:::::*{{ping|Malconfort}} I'm sorry the [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]] rule is confusing. It just means that for every article you submit for DYK, you also submit a review of someone else's DYK article nomination. Since you are only nominating one article, [[Sumac (band)]], you only need to submit one QPQ. Save the others for your next nomination. However, your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] is not complete; you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been covered. Your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds]] is also not a review, just a suggestion for the hook. Perhaps you could flesh out your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] as a QPQ for this Sumac nomination. Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 10:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 +
::::::*Updated the two. Please take a look, again.--[[User:Malconfort|''malconfort'']] ([[User talk:Malconfort|talk]]) 20:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 20:54, 1 February 2015

Sumac (band)

Created by Fezmar9 (talk). Nominated by Malconfort (talk) at 19:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg New enough, long enough, neutrally written, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook is catchy and hook ref verified and cited inline. However, the nominator has more than 5 DYK nominations to his credit, so a QPQ is in order. Yoninah (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping I'm a little confused. You used these QPQs on several other reviews, too. It would be best to assign one QPQ to one nomination (although obviously, if it's a double nomination, you would have to provide 2 QPQs). Which QPQ are you assigning to this nomination, that you haven't assigned yet? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
  • Updated the two. Please take a look, again.--malconfort (talk) 20:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)