Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Sumac (band)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Yoninah (QPQ not complete) |
imported>Malconfort (reply) |
||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
::::*Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] and [[Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds]].--[[User:Malconfort|''malconfort'']] ([[User talk:Malconfort|talk]]) 05:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ::::*Reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] and [[Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds]].--[[User:Malconfort|''malconfort'']] ([[User talk:Malconfort|talk]]) 05:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
:::::*{{ping|Malconfort}} I'm sorry the [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]] rule is confusing. It just means that for every article you submit for DYK, you also submit a review of someone else's DYK article nomination. Since you are only nominating one article, [[Sumac (band)]], you only need to submit one QPQ. Save the others for your next nomination. However, your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] is not complete; you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been covered. Your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds]] is also not a review, just a suggestion for the hook. Perhaps you could flesh out your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] as a QPQ for this Sumac nomination. Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 10:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | :::::*{{ping|Malconfort}} I'm sorry the [[WP:QPQ|QPQ]] rule is confusing. It just means that for every article you submit for DYK, you also submit a review of someone else's DYK article nomination. Since you are only nominating one article, [[Sumac (band)]], you only need to submit one QPQ. Save the others for your next nomination. However, your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] is not complete; you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the [[WP:DYK#Eligibility criteria|five main DYK criteria]] have been covered. Your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds]] is also not a review, just a suggestion for the hook. Perhaps you could flesh out your review of [[Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni]] as a QPQ for this Sumac nomination. Thanks, [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 10:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::::::*Updated the two. Please take a look, again.--[[User:Malconfort|''malconfort'']] ([[User talk:Malconfort|talk]]) 20:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 20:54, 1 February 2015
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sumac (band)
- ... that Aaron Turner is into Sumac for the heaviest experience?
Created by Fezmar9 (talk). Nominated by Malconfort (talk) at 19:46, 27 January 2015 (UTC).
New enough, long enough, neutrally written, adequately referenced, no close paraphrasing seen. Hook is catchy and hook ref verified and cited inline. However, the nominator has more than 5 DYK nominations to his credit, so a QPQ is in order. Yoninah (talk) 14:31, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
- Sorry, I forgot to mention that I've reviewed Creed (film), Belleville and North Hastings Railway and Elvis & Nixon.--malconfort (talk) 19:15, 30 January 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I'm a little confused. You used these QPQs on several other reviews, too. It would be best to assign one QPQ to one nomination (although obviously, if it's a double nomination, you would have to provide 2 QPQs). Which QPQ are you assigning to this nomination, that you haven't assigned yet? Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 17:17, 31 January 2015 (UTC)
- This rule is confusing. I'm not really sure what are you talking about. I'll review two new submissions just for this one here.--malconfort (talk) 04:12, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni and Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds.--malconfort (talk) 05:52, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I'm sorry the QPQ rule is confusing. It just means that for every article you submit for DYK, you also submit a review of someone else's DYK article nomination. Since you are only nominating one article, Sumac (band), you only need to submit one QPQ. Save the others for your next nomination. However, your review of Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni is not complete; you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been covered. Your review of Template:Did you know nominations/FourFiveSeconds is also not a review, just a suggestion for the hook. Perhaps you could flesh out your review of Template:Did you know nominations/Bolokhoveni as a QPQ for this Sumac nomination. Thanks, Yoninah (talk) 10:42, 1 February 2015 (UTC)
- Updated the two. Please take a look, again.--malconfort (talk) 20:54, 1 February 2015 (UTC)