Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Supersisters"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Sorry again, but this is now good to go. Thanks, Matty.007 13:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
imported>Matty.007 (GTG) |
imported>Maile66 (prep 3) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | <noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from May 2014]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> | |
| − | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' | |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Maile66|— Maile ]] ([[User talk:Maile66|talk]]) 14:37, 28 May 2014 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
====Supersisters==== | ====Supersisters==== | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Supersisters|Supersisters}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=Supersisters|Supersisters}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that [[Jane Pauley]], [[Margaret Mead]], and [[Gloria Steinem]] were '''''[[Supersisters]]'''''? | * ... that [[Jane Pauley]], [[Margaret Mead]], and [[Gloria Steinem]] were '''''[[Supersisters]]'''''? | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Drexel 4175|Drexel 4175]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Drexel 4175|Drexel 4175]] | ||
<small>Created/expanded by [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] ([[User talk:Gamaliel|talk]]). Self nominated at 23:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)</small>. | <small>Created/expanded by [[User:Gamaliel|Gamaliel]] ([[User talk:Gamaliel|talk]]). Self nominated at 23:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC)</small>. | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article new enough and long enough. Paragraph one needs sourcing, as does the table of who was on the cards. QPQ done. No image. Hook is not sourced at the minute, but is interesting. Article is neutral and no copyvios found in spotchecks. AGF on one offline ref. Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #FE7520;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #BC39FE;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #3474FE">007</span>]] 19:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC) | :*[[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article new enough and long enough. Paragraph one needs sourcing, as does the table of who was on the cards. QPQ done. No image. Hook is not sourced at the minute, but is interesting. Article is neutral and no copyvios found in spotchecks. AGF on one offline ref. Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #FE7520;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #BC39FE;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #3474FE">007</span>]] 19:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| Line 36: | Line 26: | ||
::::::::Very sorry, missed this on my watchlist. Just fix the orphan tag then good to go. Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #FE7520;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #BC39FE;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #3474FE">007</span>]] 11:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | ::::::::Very sorry, missed this on my watchlist. Just fix the orphan tag then good to go. Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #FE7520;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #BC39FE;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #3474FE">007</span>]] 11:07, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
::::::::{{ping|Matty.007}} Done, thanks! [[User:Gamaliel|<font color="DarkGreen">Gamaliel</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|<font color="DarkGreen">talk</font>]])</small> 13:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | ::::::::{{ping|Matty.007}} Done, thanks! [[User:Gamaliel|<font color="DarkGreen">Gamaliel</font>]] <small>([[User talk:Gamaliel|<font color="DarkGreen">talk</font>]])</small> 13:35, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | {{od}}[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Sorry again, but this is now good to go. Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #FE7520;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #BC39FE;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #3474FE">007</span>]] 13:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC) | + | {{od}}[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Sorry again, but this is now good to go. Thanks, [[User:Matty.007|<span style="color: #FE7520;">Mat</span>]][[User talk:Matty.007|<span style="color: #BC39FE;">ty</span>]]<span style="color: #800080">.</span>[[Special:Contributions/Matty.007|<span style="color: #3474FE">007</span>]] 13:36, 28 May 2014 (UTC)</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | |||
Revision as of 14:37, 28 May 2014
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by — Maile (talk) 14:37, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Supersisters
- ... that Jane Pauley, Margaret Mead, and Gloria Steinem were Supersisters?
- Reviewed: Drexel 4175
Created/expanded by Gamaliel (talk). Self nominated at 23:42, 1 May 2014 (UTC).
Article new enough and long enough. Paragraph one needs sourcing, as does the table of who was on the cards. QPQ done. No image. Hook is not sourced at the minute, but is interesting. Article is neutral and no copyvios found in spotchecks. AGF on one offline ref. Thanks, Matty.007 19:41, 3 May 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I've added a citation to the introductory paragraph. The hook is cited to sources 4 and 5 in the second to last sentence of paragraph 2. I did save a copy of the offline article, citation 1, for my own use while writing the article, and you can review it here if you wish. Thank you. Gamaliel (talk) 18:53, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
- try this link for ref 1: https://www.dropbox.com/s/wmtryfld35dd7wa/supersisters.pdf
- try this link for ref 5: http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=EgAhAAAAIBAJ&sjid=DHUFAAAAIBAJ&pg=1525%2C1560245
- Sorry for the late reply, I've been out of town for a conference. The individual cards are viewable online at the University of Iowa library, and the names and numbers are verifiable that way. I'm not sure what format to use to cite the table, and seventy two citations for each individual card seems excessive. What do you suggest? Gamaliel (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps a cite only to the library website? Pinging Template:U who probably knows better than me. Thanks, Matty.007 18:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I tried that suggestion, what do you think? I did not add the footnote to the "occupation" column because all of that language is original and based on various Wikipedia articles or other sources. 22:34, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Is there anything else I can do to improve the article to get this DYK passed? Thanks. Gamaliel (talk) 21:24, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
- Template:Ping I tried that suggestion, what do you think? I did not add the footnote to the "occupation" column because all of that language is original and based on various Wikipedia articles or other sources. 22:34, 12 May 2014 (UTC)
- Perhaps a cite only to the library website? Pinging Template:U who probably knows better than me. Thanks, Matty.007 18:33, 10 May 2014 (UTC)
- Sorry for the late reply, I've been out of town for a conference. The individual cards are viewable online at the University of Iowa library, and the names and numbers are verifiable that way. I'm not sure what format to use to cite the table, and seventy two citations for each individual card seems excessive. What do you suggest? Gamaliel (talk) 18:30, 10 May 2014 (UTC)