Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Susan J. Douglas"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Casliber (revewed) |
imported>Vanished user adhmfdfmykrdyr |
||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
:*I reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Double-banded Sandgrouse]]....[[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC) | :*I reviewed [[Template:Did you know nominations/Double-banded Sandgrouse]]....[[User:Casliber|Casliber]] ([[User talk:Casliber|talk]] '''·''' [[Special:Contributions/Casliber|contribs]]) 03:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
::* | ::* | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough. Long enough. Fully supported by inline citations. No plagiarism concerns. No images requiring a check. Reads as neutral enough. Hook is properly formatted. Yay! QPQ! :D Hook text is supported by : "In it, Douglas examines the evolution of the women in the media - the rise of depictions of power and success giving credence to the idea of feminism having fulfilled its aims, and of sexist old-style depictions of women as sex objects - and how these undermine women's status and equality.". Sourced. Source supports this. Hook is interesting enough. :) --05:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
+ | |||
+ | [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Good to go. --[[User:LauraHale|LauraHale]] ([[User talk:LauraHale|talk]]) 05:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 05:25, 5 June 2012
Susan J. Douglas
- ... that US academic Susan J. Douglas is concerned that depictions of high-powered women in media imply (incorrectly) that feminism has achieved its goals?
Created/expanded by Casliber (talk), Sue Gardner (talk). Nominated by Casliber (talk) at 22:50, 4 June 2012 (UTC)
- I reviewed Template:Did you know nominations/Double-banded Sandgrouse....Casliber (talk · contribs) 03:34, 5 June 2012 (UTC)
New enough. Long enough. Fully supported by inline citations. No plagiarism concerns. No images requiring a check. Reads as neutral enough. Hook is properly formatted. Yay! QPQ! :D Hook text is supported by : "In it, Douglas examines the evolution of the women in the media - the rise of depictions of power and success giving credence to the idea of feminism having fulfilled its aims, and of sexist old-style depictions of women as sex objects - and how these undermine women's status and equality.". Sourced. Source supports this. Hook is interesting enough. :) --05:25, 5 June 2012 (UTC)