Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Susan Stover"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
m
imported>Montanabw
(Indeed)
Line 29: Line 29:
  
 
::: {{u|Yorkshiresky}}, can you clarify the date rule for me: I created the article in my sandbox and then {{u|Montanabw}} promoted in on August 26 when we'd gone through a few rounds of edits. So I believe the article date should be August 26, since that's when it was first on Wiki proper - after all, if I'd done a copy-paste of the sandbox content, that's what would have shown up. Am I wrong? [[User:Jlvsclrk|Jlvsclrk]] ([[User talk:Jlvsclrk|talk]]) 21:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 
::: {{u|Yorkshiresky}}, can you clarify the date rule for me: I created the article in my sandbox and then {{u|Montanabw}} promoted in on August 26 when we'd gone through a few rounds of edits. So I believe the article date should be August 26, since that's when it was first on Wiki proper - after all, if I'd done a copy-paste of the sandbox content, that's what would have shown up. Am I wrong? [[User:Jlvsclrk|Jlvsclrk]] ([[User talk:Jlvsclrk|talk]]) 21:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 +
::::::It clearly passes the date rule, the clock starts when it moves into mainspace.  [[User:Montanabw|<font color="006600">Montanabw</font>]]<sup>[[User talk:Montanabw|(talk)]]</sup> 23:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 
{{od}}[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  The article was moved to mainspace [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Susan_Stover&diff=736363227&oldid=736336274 with this edit on August 26], so it meets the newness requirement. {{u|Yorkshiresky}}, if you are going to continue with this review, you must '''explicitly''' cite the criteria that you check. "OK, done the 5 points check" doesn't tell us anything. You may wish to use the Reviewer's Template in the toolbox on the right. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 
{{od}}[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  The article was moved to mainspace [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Susan_Stover&diff=736363227&oldid=736336274 with this edit on August 26], so it meets the newness requirement. {{u|Yorkshiresky}}, if you are going to continue with this review, you must '''explicitly''' cite the criteria that you check. "OK, done the 5 points check" doesn't tell us anything. You may wish to use the Reviewer's Template in the toolbox on the right. [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 22:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
 +
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 23:31, 30 August 2016

Susan Stover

  • ... that Susan Stover has received multiple awards for her research into the causes and prevention of performance-related injuries in racehorses.

Created by Jlvsclrk (talk) and Montanabw (talk). Nominated by Jlvsclrk (talk) at 05:35, 27 August 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article length ok, hooklines ok, interesting content. Only significant issue is that I assume this person is living, therefore needs a Category:Living people template added. May be a good idea to see what other categories she fits in. yorkshiresky (talk) 15:13, 27 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Categories added. Sorry about that! Jlvsclrk (talk) 15:48, 27 August 2016 (UTC)

Symbol confirmed.svg Good to go! Good article, not crucial but be good if you could source a picture. yorkshiresky (talk)

  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Template:Ping you should provide a review that explicitly confirms that the five main DYK criteria have been met. Yoninah (talk) 16:20, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
  • Symbol delete vote.svg OK, done the 5 points check. unfortunately fails as it was more than 7 days old when nominated and although expanded not by five fold. Apologies for missing this. yorkshiresky (talk) 20:38, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
Template:U, can you clarify the date rule for me: I created the article in my sandbox and then Template:U promoted in on August 26 when we'd gone through a few rounds of edits. So I believe the article date should be August 26, since that's when it was first on Wiki proper - after all, if I'd done a copy-paste of the sandbox content, that's what would have shown up. Am I wrong? Jlvsclrk (talk) 21:15, 30 August 2016 (UTC)
It clearly passes the date rule, the clock starts when it moves into mainspace. Montanabw(talk) 23:31, 30 August 2016 (UTC)

Template:OdSymbol redirect vote 4.svg The article was moved to mainspace with this edit on August 26, so it meets the newness requirement. Template:U, if you are going to continue with this review, you must explicitly cite the criteria that you check. "OK, done the 5 points check" doesn't tell us anything. You may wish to use the Reviewer's Template in the toolbox on the right. Yoninah (talk) 22:00, 30 August 2016 (UTC)