Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Svedectvo"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Evrik m (edit) |
imported>BlueMoonset (ALT1a can stand without further review) |
||
| Line 28: | Line 28: | ||
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] -Passing '''ALT1'''. Article was recent enough, obviously long enough, neutral, hook is cited in the article, no [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=/Svedectvo+&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 copyvio/closeparaphrasing] (excepting quotes & bald facts), the hooks are within character limit, accurate, sourced, and defintely interesting to a broad audience, central most of Europe. While I symapathise with the objections, it would be a mistake to equate negativity to non-neutrality. If the article reads negatively, perhaps that's because no reliable sources can be found defending the subject. '''ALT2''' by a margin? [[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="background-color:white;color:black">serial</span><span style="background-color:black;color:white;"></span>]][[Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129|<sup><span style="color:grey;">''' #'''</span></sup>]] 12:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | * [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] -Passing '''ALT1'''. Article was recent enough, obviously long enough, neutral, hook is cited in the article, no [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=/Svedectvo+&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 copyvio/closeparaphrasing] (excepting quotes & bald facts), the hooks are within character limit, accurate, sourced, and defintely interesting to a broad audience, central most of Europe. While I symapathise with the objections, it would be a mistake to equate negativity to non-neutrality. If the article reads negatively, perhaps that's because no reliable sources can be found defending the subject. '''ALT2''' by a margin? [[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="background-color:white;color:black">serial</span><span style="background-color:black;color:white;"></span>]][[Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129|<sup><span style="color:grey;">''' #'''</span></sup>]] 12:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
:*I noticed you changed the hook. Are you passing Alt1, or proposing Alt1a? --[[User:evrik|evrik]] <sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 13:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | :*I noticed you changed the hook. Are you passing Alt1, or proposing Alt1a? --[[User:evrik|evrik]] <sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 13:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
| + | ::*Since the only difference between ALT1 and ALT1a is the dropping of the word "apologist" in the latter, there is no need for a further review of ALT1a. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC) | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 21:03, 15 May 2020
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Svedectvo
- ... that Slovak periodical Svedectvo claimed that the neo-Nazi Kotleba party "is the first authentic right-wing party to get into parliament and dedicate its program to defending the Christian values of our state"?
- ALT1:... that the Slovak periodical Svedectvo receives a government subsidy, despite publishing apologist articles defending convicted war criminals?
- Reviewed: Abel Briones Ruiz
- Comment: Sources in article
Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 19:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC).
- 16px New enough, long enough. The hooks are not neutral. The tone of the article is not neutrally written either. I don't know how to fix that. --evrik (talk) 15:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
-
- Template:Re This is still not neutral, has the nominator/article creator been notified? Rephrasing content throughout should hopefully clear this up. Kingsif (talk) 17:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
- ALT1a:... that the Slovak periodical Svedectvo receives a government subsidy, despite publishing articles defending convicted war criminals?
-Passing ALT1. Article was recent enough, obviously long enough, neutral, hook is cited in the article, no copyvio/closeparaphrasing (excepting quotes & bald facts), the hooks are within character limit, accurate, sourced, and defintely interesting to a broad audience, central most of Europe. While I symapathise with the objections, it would be a mistake to equate negativity to non-neutrality. If the article reads negatively, perhaps that's because no reliable sources can be found defending the subject. ALT2 by a margin? serial # 12:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- I noticed you changed the hook. Are you passing Alt1, or proposing Alt1a? --evrik (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
- Since the only difference between ALT1 and ALT1a is the dropping of the word "apologist" in the latter, there is no need for a further review of ALT1a. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)