Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Svedectvo"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>BlueMoonset
(ALT1a can stand without further review)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 5)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from March 2020]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=March 2020  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]])&nbsp;19:27, 16 May 2020 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK header|Svedectvo}}
 
{{DYK header|Svedectvo}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Svedectvo|Svedectvo}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Svedectvo|Svedectvo}}
<!--
 
    Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
-->
 
 
* ... that Slovak periodical '''''[[Svedectvo]]''''' claimed that the neo-Nazi [[Kotleba party]] "is the first authentic right-wing party to get into parliament and dedicate its program to defending the Christian values of our state"?
 
* ... that Slovak periodical '''''[[Svedectvo]]''''' claimed that the neo-Nazi [[Kotleba party]] "is the first authentic right-wing party to get into parliament and dedicate its program to defending the Christian values of our state"?
 
** '''ALT1''':... that the Slovak periodical '''''[[Svedectvo]]''''' receives a government subsidy, despite publishing apologist articles defending convicted war criminals?
 
** '''ALT1''':... that the Slovak periodical '''''[[Svedectvo]]''''' receives a government subsidy, despite publishing apologist articles defending convicted war criminals?
Line 14: Line 11:
 
:* ''Comment'': Sources in article
 
:* ''Comment'': Sources in article
 
<small>Created by [[User:Buidhe|Buidhe]] ([[User talk:Buidhe|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Buidhe|Buidhe]] ([[User talk:Buidhe|talk]]). Self-nominated at 19:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Svedectvo|Buidhe|subpage=Svedectvo}}
 
-->
 
  
 
* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough. The hooks are not neutral. The tone of the article is not neutrally written either. I don't know how to fix that. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 15:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
 
* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough. The hooks are not neutral. The tone of the article is not neutrally written either. I don't know how to fix that. --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 15:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
Line 28: Line 22:
 
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] -Passing '''ALT1'''. Article was recent enough, obviously long enough, neutral, hook is cited in the article, no [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=/Svedectvo+&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 copyvio/closeparaphrasing] (excepting quotes & bald facts), the hooks are within character limit, accurate, sourced, and defintely interesting to a broad audience, central most of Europe. While I symapathise with the objections, it would be a mistake to equate negativity to non-neutrality. If the article reads negatively, perhaps that's because no reliable sources can be found defending the subject. '''ALT2''' by a margin?  [[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="background-color:white;color:black">serial</span><span style="background-color:black;color:white;"></span>]][[Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129|<sup><span style="color:grey;">''' #'''</span></sup>]] 12:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 
* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] -Passing '''ALT1'''. Article was recent enough, obviously long enough, neutral, hook is cited in the article, no [https://tools.wmflabs.org/copyvios/?lang=en&project=wikipedia&title=/Svedectvo+&oldid=&action=search&use_engine=1&use_links=1&turnitin=0 copyvio/closeparaphrasing] (excepting quotes & bald facts), the hooks are within character limit, accurate, sourced, and defintely interesting to a broad audience, central most of Europe. While I symapathise with the objections, it would be a mistake to equate negativity to non-neutrality. If the article reads negatively, perhaps that's because no reliable sources can be found defending the subject. '''ALT2''' by a margin?  [[User talk:Serial Number 54129|<span style="background-color:white;color:black">serial</span><span style="background-color:black;color:white;"></span>]][[Special:contributions/Serial Number 54129|<sup><span style="color:grey;">''' #'''</span></sup>]] 12:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 
:*I noticed you changed the hook. Are you passing Alt1, or proposing Alt1a? --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 13:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
 
:*I noticed you changed the hook. Are you passing Alt1, or proposing Alt1a? --[[User:evrik|evrik]]&nbsp;<sup>([[User talk:evrik|talk]])</sup> 13:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
::*Since the only difference between ALT1 and ALT1a is the dropping of the word "apologist" in the latter, there is no need for a further review of ALT1a. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)
+
::*Since the only difference between ALT1 and ALT1a is the dropping of the word "apologist" in the latter, there is no need for a further review of ALT1a. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 21:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 

Latest revision as of 19:27, 16 May 2020

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 19:27, 16 May 2020 (UTC)

Svedectvo

  • ... that Slovak periodical Svedectvo claimed that the neo-Nazi Kotleba party "is the first authentic right-wing party to get into parliament and dedicate its program to defending the Christian values of our state"?
    • ALT1:... that the Slovak periodical Svedectvo receives a government subsidy, despite publishing apologist articles defending convicted war criminals?

Created by Buidhe (talk). Self-nominated at 19:32, 17 March 2020 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg New enough, long enough. The hooks are not neutral. The tone of the article is not neutrally written either. I don't know how to fix that. --evrik (talk) 15:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Symbol redirect vote 4.svg Asking for a second opinion. --evrik (talk) 15:33, 14 April 2020 (UTC)
  • Template:Re This is still not neutral, has the nominator/article creator been notified? Rephrasing content throughout should hopefully clear this up. Kingsif (talk) 17:00, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • It isn't helpful just to handwave that "it's not neutral". Without explaining why you think so or what you think should be changed, there's no way to fix the alleged problem. buidhe 21:56, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • The breathless prose seems agitated. It seems more like a novella than a neutral history. --evrik (talk) 22:16, 16 April 2020 (UTC)
  • I disagree. Again, it would be helpful if you pointed out to specific instances, examples and/or suggestions for improvement. buidhe 03:12, 17 April 2020 (UTC)

Template:Od

  • ALT1a:... that the Slovak periodical Svedectvo receives a government subsidy, despite publishing articles defending convicted war criminals?
  • Symbol confirmed.svg -Passing ALT1. Article was recent enough, obviously long enough, neutral, hook is cited in the article, no copyvio/closeparaphrasing (excepting quotes & bald facts), the hooks are within character limit, accurate, sourced, and defintely interesting to a broad audience, central most of Europe. While I symapathise with the objections, it would be a mistake to equate negativity to non-neutrality. If the article reads negatively, perhaps that's because no reliable sources can be found defending the subject. ALT2 by a margin? serial # 12:16, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
  • I noticed you changed the hook. Are you passing Alt1, or proposing Alt1a? --evrik (talk) 13:57, 9 May 2020 (UTC)
  • Since the only difference between ALT1 and ALT1a is the dropping of the word "apologist" in the latter, there is no need for a further review of ALT1a. BlueMoonset (talk) 21:02, 15 May 2020 (UTC)