Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Swami Vivekananda (film)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Crisco 1492 (re) |
imported>Titodutta (re) |
||
Line 31: | Line 31: | ||
::* Hello and thank you for starting the review. Here are the updates: a) I have removed the sentence b) there were an issue with a citation, India Today June 1998 citation was added twice, I added the URL with archived copy and Nvvchar added it once more. I have fixed it. c) I could not understand the "publisher" issue. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Titodutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Titodutta|Dutta]]</span> 08:23, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | ::* Hello and thank you for starting the review. Here are the updates: a) I have removed the sentence b) there were an issue with a citation, India Today June 1998 citation was added twice, I added the URL with archived copy and Nvvchar added it once more. I have fixed it. c) I could not understand the "publisher" issue. --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Titodutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Titodutta|Dutta]]</span> 08:23, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
:::*Not saying it needed to be removed, but attributed. "According to (source), this choice was not wrong, but rather "absolutely breathtaking"." or the like (the "glaring omission" bit is another one). The publisher/work seems to have been with ''India Today'', but double check to see if Hinduism Today, Rediff, etc. should be italicised or not. Also, curious about the poster: is that Sarvadaman D. Banerjee as Swami Vivekananda, or a picture of Vivekananda from the 1893 photo shoot? — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 08:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | :::*Not saying it needed to be removed, but attributed. "According to (source), this choice was not wrong, but rather "absolutely breathtaking"." or the like (the "glaring omission" bit is another one). The publisher/work seems to have been with ''India Today'', but double check to see if Hinduism Today, Rediff, etc. should be italicised or not. Also, curious about the poster: is that Sarvadaman D. Banerjee as Swami Vivekananda, or a picture of Vivekananda from the 1893 photo shoot? — [[User:Crisco 1492|Crisco 1492]] ([[User talk:Crisco 1492|talk]]) 08:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | ||
− | + | ::::* a) I have rewritten that "glaring omission" sentence, b_ newspaper names should be italicized— am I missing anything? c) yes, you are right, that is poster of the film depicting Sarvadaman Banerjee posing as Vivekananda --<span style="background:orange;border:orange ridge">[[User:Titodutta|Tito]]</span><span style="color:blue;background:white;otit;border-bottom-style:ridge;">☸</span><span style="background:#57C738;border:green ridge">[[User talk:Titodutta|Dutta]]</span> 09:39, 8 September 2013 (UTC) | |
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | {{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
Revision as of 09:39, 8 September 2013
DYK toolbox |
---|
Swami Vivekananda (film)
- ... that Mithun Chakraborty (pictured) won the National Film Award in the Best Supporting Actor category for his portrayal of Ramakrishna in the film Swami Vivekananda (1998)?
5x expanded by Titodutta (talk), Ekabhishek (talk), Nvvchar (talk), and Dwaipayanc (talk). Nominated by Titodutta (talk) at 08:17, 7 September 2013 (UTC).
- Date request
User:Titodutta/Swami Vivekananda DYK celebration September 2013
Article is new enough, long enough. I see some POV caused by a lack of attribution, such as "though this choice was not wrong and proved to be “absolutely breathtaking”." Work and publisher parameters seem to be mixed up in places. Don't see any close paraphrasing. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 07:18, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Hello and thank you for starting the review. Here are the updates: a) I have removed the sentence b) there were an issue with a citation, India Today June 1998 citation was added twice, I added the URL with archived copy and Nvvchar added it once more. I have fixed it. c) I could not understand the "publisher" issue. --Tito☸Dutta 08:23, 8 September 2013 (UTC)
- Not saying it needed to be removed, but attributed. "According to (source), this choice was not wrong, but rather "absolutely breathtaking"." or the like (the "glaring omission" bit is another one). The publisher/work seems to have been with India Today, but double check to see if Hinduism Today, Rediff, etc. should be italicised or not. Also, curious about the poster: is that Sarvadaman D. Banerjee as Swami Vivekananda, or a picture of Vivekananda from the 1893 photo shoot? — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)