Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Symphonic Prelude (Bruckner)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Cwmhiraeth
(Hook problem)
imported>Meneerke bloem
Line 22: Line 22:
  
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Although the Mahler part of the hook is acceptable, the Bruckner part is less clear. The 1997 paragraph in the article, in the section called "The truth?", does not mention Bruckner by name. I think his name will need to be mentioned and cited in the same sentence as the 1997 first performance to support the hook. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 11:51, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Although the Mahler part of the hook is acceptable, the Bruckner part is less clear. The 1997 paragraph in the article, in the section called "The truth?", does not mention Bruckner by name. I think his name will need to be mentioned and cited in the same sentence as the 1997 first performance to support the hook. [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 11:51, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
 +
::I propose to amend it as follows: "... not everyone became convinced ''that the piece was originated by Bruckner'' and so the "controversial" piece remained rarely performed. ''The original orchestration'' was performed first ...". OK so? --[[User:Meneerke bloem|Réginald alias Meneerke bloem]] <small>([[User talk:Meneerke bloem|To reply]])</small> 09:15, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 09:16, 13 January 2015

Symphonic Prelude (Bruckner)

Created by Meneerke bloem (talk). Nominated by Gerda Arendt (talk) at 16:56, 9 December 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Although the Mahler part of the hook is acceptable, the Bruckner part is less clear. The 1997 paragraph in the article, in the section called "The truth?", does not mention Bruckner by name. I think his name will need to be mentioned and cited in the same sentence as the 1997 first performance to support the hook. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2015 (UTC)
I propose to amend it as follows: "... not everyone became convinced that the piece was originated by Bruckner and so the "controversial" piece remained rarely performed. The original orchestration was performed first ...". OK so? --Réginald alias Meneerke bloem (To reply) 09:15, 13 January 2015 (UTC)