Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Tarquin and Lucretia (Titian)"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Ceoil
(r)
imported>PFHLai
(to P3)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from May 2016]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
|monthyear=May 2016  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes or no -->
+
 
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:PFHLai|PFHLai]] ([[User talk:PFHLai|talk]]) 20:07, 6 May 2016 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Tarquin and Lucretia (Titian)====
 
====Tarquin and Lucretia (Titian)====
Line 8: Line 8:
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 
<div style="float:right; margin-left:0.5em;" id="mp-dyk-img">
 
{{main page image|image=Tizian 094.jpg|caption= ''Tarquin and Lucretia'', Titian, 1571|width=120x133}}
 
{{main page image|image=Tizian 094.jpg|caption= ''Tarquin and Lucretia'', Titian, 1571|width=120x133}}
</div><!--
+
</div>
 
 
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
 
 
-->
 
 
* ... that [[Titian]]'s painting of '''''[[Tarquin and Lucretia (Titian)|Tarquin and Lucretia]]''''' (1571, illustrated) took over three years to complete?
 
* ... that [[Titian]]'s painting of '''''[[Tarquin and Lucretia (Titian)|Tarquin and Lucretia]]''''' (1571, illustrated) took over three years to complete?
 
* ALT1 ... that [[Titian]]'s '''''[[Tarquin and Lucretia (Titian)|Tarquin and Lucretia]]''''' (1571, illustrated) shows the incident that led to the [[overthrow of the Roman monarchy]] in c. 509 BC?
 
* ALT1 ... that [[Titian]]'s '''''[[Tarquin and Lucretia (Titian)|Tarquin and Lucretia]]''''' (1571, illustrated) shows the incident that led to the [[overthrow of the Roman monarchy]] in c. 509 BC?
Line 18: Line 14:
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Susan Rice (banker)]]
 
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Susan Rice (banker)]]
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]). Self-nominated at 17:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>5x expanded by [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]). Self-nominated at 17:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC).</small>
<!--
 
* {{DYKmake|Tarquin and Lucretia (Titian)|Johnbod|subpage=Tarquin and Lucretia (Titian)}}
 
-->
 
  
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article expanded and long enough. QPQ done.  Both hooks are neutral, and acceptable. I AGF with regard to sources. The  pic-caption ("A man with a knife threatening a naked woman on her bed") could be improved, though. Otherwise,  I think it's good to go. [[User:Huldra|Huldra]] ([[User talk:Huldra|talk]]) 20:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
 
:*[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] Article expanded and long enough. QPQ done.  Both hooks are neutral, and acceptable. I AGF with regard to sources. The  pic-caption ("A man with a knife threatening a naked woman on her bed") could be improved, though. Otherwise,  I think it's good to go. [[User:Huldra|Huldra]] ([[User talk:Huldra|talk]]) 20:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Line 29: Line 22:
 
::::::Sorry, trying to do an alt text. I don't know why we have these captions at DYK. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 04:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 
::::::Sorry, trying to do an alt text. I don't know why we have these captions at DYK. [[User:Johnbod|Johnbod]] ([[User talk:Johnbod|talk]]) 04:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 
::::::::I was wondering the same thing, and suspected as much. Very strong article on a major Titian; impeccable use of sources, and provides useful and accessible interpretation. Good to go, yes. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 07:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
 
::::::::I was wondering the same thing, and suspected as much. Very strong article on a major Titian; impeccable use of sources, and provides useful and accessible interpretation. Good to go, yes. [[User:Ceoil|Ceoil]] ([[User talk:Ceoil|talk]]) 07:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 20:07, 6 May 2016

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by PFHLai (talk) 20:07, 6 May 2016 (UTC)

Tarquin and Lucretia (Titian)

Tarquin and Lucretia, Titian, 1571
Tarquin and Lucretia, Titian, 1571

5x expanded by Johnbod (talk). Self-nominated at 17:07, 1 May 2016 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg Article expanded and long enough. QPQ done. Both hooks are neutral, and acceptable. I AGF with regard to sources. The pic-caption ("A man with a knife threatening a naked woman on her bed") could be improved, though. Otherwise, I think it's good to go. Huldra (talk) 20:19, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
  • ALT 1 is a stronger hook. Ceoil (talk) 21:51, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
It certainly is the most informative hook, so, ALT 1 it is, (But the pic-caption still is not good) Huldra (talk) 21:55, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Cap should simply be Tarquin and Lucretia Titian, 1571? Not the most exciting ever, but. Ceoil (talk) 22:02, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Agree, not exciting...but encyclopaedic, I believe: that will do, Huldra (talk) 22:08, 1 May 2016 (UTC)
Sorry, trying to do an alt text. I don't know why we have these captions at DYK. Johnbod (talk) 04:21, 2 May 2016 (UTC)
I was wondering the same thing, and suspected as much. Very strong article on a major Titian; impeccable use of sources, and provides useful and accessible interpretation. Good to go, yes. Ceoil (talk) 07:35, 2 May 2016 (UTC)