Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Book of Gutsy Women"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Gerda Arendt (hook?) |
imported>Wasted Time R (propose ALT1 and ALT2) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
: [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Interesting book, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. I am not so happy with the mysterious hook, and would prefer to read some more about the book, rather than about the past living conditions of the authors. How about using the terms from the subtitle, for example? - If you insist, I'll approve, though ;) --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 14:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | : [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Interesting book, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. I am not so happy with the mysterious hook, and would prefer to read some more about the book, rather than about the past living conditions of the authors. How about using the terms from the subtitle, for example? - If you insist, I'll approve, though ;) --[[User:Gerda Arendt|Gerda Arendt]] ([[User talk:Gerda Arendt|talk]]) 14:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :: {{ping|Gerda Arendt}} Thanks very much for reviewing. My theory about hooks is that anything's fair if it's accurate and causes main page viewers to click through to the article. But I understand your objection. So how about this: | ||
| + | ::* '''ALT1''': ... that '''''[[The Book of Gutsy Women]]''''' explains what 17th century nun [[Juana Inés de la Cruz]] and 21st century teenager [[Greta Thunberg]] have in common? | ||
| + | :: That deliberately under-explains who these two people are, again to try to induce click-throughs. A fuller version would be: | ||
| + | ::* '''ALT2''': ... that '''''[[The Book of Gutsy Women]]''''' explains what 17th century nun and self-taught scholar [[Juana Inés de la Cruz]] and 21st century teenage climate activist [[Greta Thunberg]] have in common? | ||
| + | ::Let me know what you think. [[User:Wasted Time R|Wasted Time R]] ([[User talk:Wasted Time R|talk]]) 10:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 10:27, 10 October 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Book of Gutsy Women
- ... that the mother-and-daughter authors of The Book of Gutsy Women used to live in a famous house?
5x expanded by Wasted Time R (talk). Nominated by Wasted Time R (talk) at 00:29, 8 October 2019 (UTC).
Interesting book, on good sources, no copyvio obvious. I am not so happy with the mysterious hook, and would prefer to read some more about the book, rather than about the past living conditions of the authors. How about using the terms from the subtitle, for example? - If you insist, I'll approve, though ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 14:17, 9 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thanks very much for reviewing. My theory about hooks is that anything's fair if it's accurate and causes main page viewers to click through to the article. But I understand your objection. So how about this:
- ALT1: ... that The Book of Gutsy Women explains what 17th century nun Juana Inés de la Cruz and 21st century teenager Greta Thunberg have in common?
- That deliberately under-explains who these two people are, again to try to induce click-throughs. A fuller version would be:
- ALT2: ... that The Book of Gutsy Women explains what 17th century nun and self-taught scholar Juana Inés de la Cruz and 21st century teenage climate activist Greta Thunberg have in common?
- Let me know what you think. Wasted Time R (talk) 10:27, 10 October 2019 (UTC)
- Template:Ping Thanks very much for reviewing. My theory about hooks is that anything's fair if it's accurate and causes main page viewers to click through to the article. But I understand your objection. So how about this: