Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The California Field Atlas"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Flibirigit (Obi Kaufmann review posted, will resume tomorrow on the The California Field Atlas) |
imported>Flibirigit (formal DYK review completed, minor questions outstanding.) |
||
| Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
|qpq = y | |qpq = y | ||
|status = ? | |status = ? | ||
| − | |comments = Article created and nominated same time, therefore new enough. Length is adequate, and I detected no plagiarism issues. The hook is not cited directly in this article, but it is mentioned in the article on the atlas itself which is sufficient. QPQ requirements have been met. I am curious if a source is available for the last sentence in the "The California Field Atlas and other books" section, regarding future publications. I apologize in the delay in getting back to this review. I will start the review for the article on the atlas tomorrow. | + | |comments = Article created and nominated same time, therefore new enough. Length is adequate, prose is neutral in tone, and I detected no plagiarism issues. The hook is not cited directly in this article, but it is mentioned in the article on the atlas itself which is sufficient. QPQ requirements have been met. I am curious if a source is available for the last sentence in the "The California Field Atlas and other books" section, regarding future publications. I apologize in the delay in getting back to this review. I will start the review for the article on the atlas tomorrow. |
|sign = [[User:Flibirigit|Flibirigit]] ([[User talk:Flibirigit|talk]]) 03:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC) | |sign = [[User:Flibirigit|Flibirigit]] ([[User talk:Flibirigit|talk]]) 03:36, 25 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
| + | }} | ||
| + | |||
| + | '''The California Field Atlas review''' | ||
| + | {{DYK checklist | ||
| + | |newness = y | ||
| + | |length = y | ||
| + | |sourced = ? | ||
| + | |neutral = y | ||
| + | |plagiarismfree = y | ||
| + | |hookcited = y | ||
| + | |hookinterest = y | ||
| + | |picfree = NA | ||
| + | |qpq = y | ||
| + | |status = ? | ||
| + | |comments = Article nominated within 7 days of GA promition, therefore new enough. Length is adequate, prose is neutral in tone, and I detected no plagiarism issues. Hook is properly mentioned, is interesting, and cited inline. QPQ requirements have been met. I have a couple minor sourcing questions. In the second paragraph of the "Artwork" section, is there a source available for the final sentence? In the "Follow-up" section, same question as the other review; I am curious if a source is available for the future publications. | ||
| + | |sign = [[User:Flibirigit|Flibirigit]] ([[User talk:Flibirigit|talk]]) 19:19, 25 June 2019 (UTC) | ||
}} | }} | ||
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 19:19, 25 June 2019
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The California Field Atlas, Obi Kaufmann
- ( Back to T:TDYK )
- ( Article history links: The California Field Atlas
- Obi Kaufmann )
- ... that The California Field Atlas by Obi Kaufmann is neither a field guide nor a conventional atlas? Source: Myrow 2018 and Spotswood 2018—both of these are audio interviews with the author, who explains his terminology and why he fused those two genre terms together. The relevant quotes and time locations from these interviews are cited in the article; see the first two sentences of the "Genre and themes" section and the footnotes there.
- Reviewed: A Colour Box and Mario Pouliot
- Comment: For the reviewer's convenience: "The California Field Atlas" was promoted to GA on May 19; "Obi Kaufmann" was created on May 23.
Improved to Good Article status by Brandt Luke Zorn (talk). Self-nominated at 22:38, 23 May 2019 (UTC).
Template:U, since this nomination includes two eligible DYK articles, two QPQ credits are required. There appears to only be one listed. Flibirigit (talk) 18:03, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Note: I am willing to start the full review on both nominations, once I finished at XIX Army Corps. Thanks in advance. Flibirigit (talk) 18:07, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Sounds good! My mistake on the double QPQ; didn't realize I had to do two, but I'm happy to do so. I've started a DYK review at Gregory Gray, results pending feedback on my comments. I wanted to have a "complete" QPQ so that we weren't waiting on results of a separate nom, so I scrolled through the page again to see if I could find a nom that was ready to go. I found Mario Pouliot—I promise it was a coincidence that it happened to be your nomination—which I've approved. —BLZ · talk 20:33, 21 June 2019 (UTC)
- Thanks for the update. I will get back to this hopefully on Sunday, or Monday at the latest. Flibirigit (talk) 03:41, 22 June 2019 (UTC)
Obi Kaufmann review Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
The California Field Atlas review Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.