Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Cambridge History of India"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Philafrenzy (r) |
imported>Philafrenzy m (CE) |
||
| Line 22: | Line 22: | ||
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Length and date ok. All refs are off-line, so no check for close paraphrase possible. This should probably have been nominated as 'not a self-nom', User:Edwardx has only edited a minor part of the article [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Cambridge_History_of_India&diff=610324677&oldid=610275482]. The hook claim needs a direct reference. Also, the section Volume V and VI lack reference. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 07:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | :* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Length and date ok. All refs are off-line, so no check for close paraphrase possible. This should probably have been nominated as 'not a self-nom', User:Edwardx has only edited a minor part of the article [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Cambridge_History_of_India&diff=610324677&oldid=610275482]. The hook claim needs a direct reference. Also, the section Volume V and VI lack reference. --[[User:Soman|Soman]] ([[User talk:Soman|talk]]) 07:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | ||
| − | ::Fixed those things - please take another look. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 09:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC) | + | ::*Fixed those things - please take another look. [[User:Philafrenzy|Philafrenzy]] ([[User talk:Philafrenzy|talk]]) 09:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 09:40, 31 May 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Cambridge History of India
- ... that The Cambridge History of India would have had six volumes, but Volume II was abandoned?
- Reviewed: Chippenham Lodge
Created by Philafrenzy (talk), Edwardx (talk). Nominated by Edwardx (talk) at 10:03, 27 May 2014 (UTC).
Length and date ok. All refs are off-line, so no check for close paraphrase possible. This should probably have been nominated as 'not a self-nom', User:Edwardx has only edited a minor part of the article [1]. The hook claim needs a direct reference. Also, the section Volume V and VI lack reference. --Soman (talk) 07:57, 31 May 2014 (UTC)
- Fixed those things - please take another look. Philafrenzy (talk) 09:40, 31 May 2014 (UTC)