Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Castle Doctrine"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Czar
(review)
imported>Czar
(more hook ce)
Line 11: Line 11:
  
 
-->
 
-->
* ... that the 2014 [[strategy video game]] '''''[[The Castle Doctrine]]''''' was created in part as an artistic statement on [[Right to keep and bear arms|gun rights]]?
+
* ... that the 2014 [[strategy video game]] '''''[[The Castle Doctrine]]''''' was created in part as an "artistic statement" on [[Right to keep and bear arms|gun rights]]?
 
<!--  
 
<!--  
 
-->
 
-->

Revision as of 04:51, 11 February 2014

The Castle Doctrine

Created by Tezero (talk), Samwalton9 (talk). Nominated by Samwalton9 (talk) at 12:26, 6 February 2014 (UTC).

  • ALT1 ...that Russ Pitts, an editor at Polygon, described The Castle Doctrine as the most disturbing video game he'd ever played?
    • The original hook is a bit weak, "partially as an artistic statement" doesn't seem to say much, and gun rights aren't the primary concern of the game (as opposed to something like Molleindustria's The Best Amendment. The alt hook makes a stronger statement. The statement is sourced to Pitt's twitter rather than his review at Polygon, but should count as a reliable self published source. - hahnchen 23:34, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
      • I'm happy with that alt, struggled to find one I liked originally. Samwalton9 (talk) 23:56, 10 February 2014 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg New (Feb. 4), long enough, within policy, no copyvio in spotcheck, QPQ done. First hook doesn't have immediate refs in article (see 3b). Please ping me if I don't respond. czar  04:51, 11 February 2014 (UTC)