Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Haunting (1963 film)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Lexein (gah whatever, with the two discussions.) |
imported>~riley (f) |
||
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
:*Once this has passed DYK checks, perhaps it can be listed for the Halloween DYKs. - [[User:Tim1965|Tim1965]] ([[User talk:Tim1965|talk]]) 04:14, 8 October 2012 (UTC) | :*Once this has passed DYK checks, perhaps it can be listed for the Halloween DYKs. - [[User:Tim1965|Tim1965]] ([[User talk:Tim1965|talk]]) 04:14, 8 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
| − | :**[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Bolded article name in hook. | + | :**[[File:Symbol delete vote.svg|16px]] Bolded article name in hook. Article has not been created or expanded 5x within the past 10 days (2596 days) (was 3658[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Haunting_(1963_film)&oldid=514721079], needs to be 18290[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Haunting_(1963_film)]) Popular culture section is not sourced. '''<span title="Shoot!" style="font-family: Mono; Cursor: crosshair;">-- Cheers, </span><font color=#0E0E42>[[User:Riley Huntley|Riley]]</font> <font color=#0066FF>[[User talk:Riley Huntley|Huntley]]</font>''' 06:38, 8 October 2012 (UTC) |
:::*Correction(?): it's currently[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Haunting_%281963_film%29&oldid=516575662] '''16254''' prose size per prosesizebytes.js --[[User:Lexein|Lexein]] ([[User talk:Lexein|talk]]) 07:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC) | :::*Correction(?): it's currently[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=The_Haunting_%281963_film%29&oldid=516575662] '''16254''' prose size per prosesizebytes.js --[[User:Lexein|Lexein]] ([[User talk:Lexein|talk]]) 07:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
::::*Correction: I meant the article needs to be at a character count of 18290 (fixed comment). '''<span title="Shoot!" style="font-family: Mono; Cursor: crosshair;">-- Cheers, </span><font color=#0E0E42>[[User:Riley Huntley|Riley]]</font> <font color=#0066FF>[[User talk:Riley Huntley|Huntley]]</font>''' 07:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC) | ::::*Correction: I meant the article needs to be at a character count of 18290 (fixed comment). '''<span title="Shoot!" style="font-family: Mono; Cursor: crosshair;">-- Cheers, </span><font color=#0E0E42>[[User:Riley Huntley|Riley]]</font> <font color=#0066FF>[[User talk:Riley Huntley|Huntley]]</font>''' 07:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 19:16, 8 October 2012
The Haunting (1963 film)
- ... that to enhance their performances, a "prescored" soundtrack of violent noises and voices was played during the filming of the 1963 film The Haunting to give the actors something to react to?
- Reviewed: Song 4 Mutya (Out of Control)
Created/expanded by Tim1965 (talk). Self nom at 04:11, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Once this has passed DYK checks, perhaps it can be listed for the Halloween DYKs. - Tim1965 (talk) 04:14, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Correction(?): it's currently[3] 16254 prose size per prosesizebytes.js --Lexein (talk) 07:12, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- Correction: I meant the article needs to be at a character count of 18290 (fixed comment). -- Cheers, Riley Huntley 07:18, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- At [4], 2036 chars to go. The plot section is only 915 chars: per MOS:FILM it could be 400-700 words (2000 - 3500 chars).
Also, resolve those {{citation needed}}s.resolved sufficiently. --Lexein (talk) 07:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- At [4], 2036 chars to go. The plot section is only 915 chars: per MOS:FILM it could be 400-700 words (2000 - 3500 chars).
- My understanding is that neither the plot section nor the cast list should be counted when estimating five-fold expansion. I'm unclear as to where in DYK rules it says that there can't still be problems (even citation problems) with this article. The DYK fact-hook is properly cited. - Tim1965 (talk) 13:22, 8 October 2012 (UTC)
- There's no "plot exception" that I could find in WP:Did you know or WP:Did you know/Supplementary guidelines; this was discussed in WT:Did_you_know#Plots. Plots don't need to be cited, per MOS:FILM. The ProseSize tools automatically exclude all lists and include all non-HTML and non-wikitext prose.
- There was no need to trim the cast list by my lights, but, as you wish.
- I did not insist on plot expansion, just noted that it was a ripe opportunity for expansion. I greatly appreciate the expansion work on the rest of the article first.
- In the rules, there is: "Articles with good references and citations are preferred." Also, it's in the reviewing guidelines whenever this Talk is opened for editing: "cites sources with inline citations". Sorta seems sporting to take a stab at resolving citations needed, or removing the unsourced claims. There's only one now, so not a show stopper. The reviewer may disagree.
- Why split discussion, forcing two reply locations? Geez. --Lexein (talk) 16:02, 8 October 2012 (UTC)