Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Little Red Chairs"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Sadads
(resp.)
imported>Mifter
(second review)
Line 20: Line 20:
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] - Not a full review - Upon starting to review the article I immediately noticed that the article has a very large number of quotes within it (Earwigs also flags them) totaling over 25 at a quick count.  I am concerned that that number is [[WP:QUOTEFARM|too high]] and that we are overusing [[WP:NFCCP|non-free content]].  [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 05:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 
:* [[File:Symbol possible vote.svg|16px]] - Not a full review - Upon starting to review the article I immediately noticed that the article has a very large number of quotes within it (Earwigs also flags them) totaling over 25 at a quick count.  I am concerned that that number is [[WP:QUOTEFARM|too high]] and that we are overusing [[WP:NFCCP|non-free content]].  [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 05:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
 
::*{{ping|Mifter}} I don't see how it could be less quoty: I have never read the book, and most of the focus of the articles is on critical opinions (which necessarily requires quoting-- they are opinions after all). If you wanted to trim any of the quotes: I welcome that. But start articles for novels frequently start like this, and even Featured Articles on novels, have quote heavy opinion sections (see [[Moonraker_(novel)#Reception]], [[The_Good_Terrorist#Reception]] and [[Tintin_in_Tibet#Reception]]). [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 23:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 
::*{{ping|Mifter}} I don't see how it could be less quoty: I have never read the book, and most of the focus of the articles is on critical opinions (which necessarily requires quoting-- they are opinions after all). If you wanted to trim any of the quotes: I welcome that. But start articles for novels frequently start like this, and even Featured Articles on novels, have quote heavy opinion sections (see [[Moonraker_(novel)#Reception]], [[The_Good_Terrorist#Reception]] and [[Tintin_in_Tibet#Reception]]). [[User:Sadads|Sadads]] ([[User talk:Sadads|talk]]) 23:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)
 +
[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]]  - thanks for the response.  I understand where you are coming from but am still not sure.  In the interests of preventing this from sitting for a long period I'm asking for a second reviewer/opinion.  [[User:Mifter|Mifter]] ([[User talk:Mifter|talk]]) 01:46, 15 March 2017 (UTC)
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 01:46, 15 March 2017

The Little Red Chairs

Created/expanded by Sadads (talk). Self-nominated at 03:54, 4 March 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol possible vote.svg - Not a full review - Upon starting to review the article I immediately noticed that the article has a very large number of quotes within it (Earwigs also flags them) totaling over 25 at a quick count. I am concerned that that number is too high and that we are overusing non-free content. Mifter (talk) 05:12, 5 March 2017 (UTC)
  • Template:Ping I don't see how it could be less quoty: I have never read the book, and most of the focus of the articles is on critical opinions (which necessarily requires quoting-- they are opinions after all). If you wanted to trim any of the quotes: I welcome that. But start articles for novels frequently start like this, and even Featured Articles on novels, have quote heavy opinion sections (see Moonraker_(novel)#Reception, The_Good_Terrorist#Reception and Tintin_in_Tibet#Reception). Sadads (talk) 23:07, 7 March 2017 (UTC)

Symbol redirect vote 4.svg - thanks for the response. I understand where you are coming from but am still not sure. In the interests of preventing this from sitting for a long period I'm asking for a second reviewer/opinion. Mifter (talk) 01:46, 15 March 2017 (UTC)