Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Love Train"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>SL93 m |
imported>Cwmhiraeth (To Prep 5) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | {{ | + | <includeonly>{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|Talk|</includeonly>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations from July 2019]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;"> |
| − | | | + | :''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.'' |
| − | + | ||
| − | | | + | The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Cwmhiraeth|Cwmhiraeth]] ([[User talk:Cwmhiraeth|talk]]) 05:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)<br /> |
{{DYK conditions}} | {{DYK conditions}} | ||
{{DYK header|The Love Train}} | {{DYK header|The Love Train}} | ||
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=The Love Train|The Love Train}} | {{DYK nompage links|nompage=The Love Train|The Love Train}} | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
* ... that [[Meghan Trainor]]'s 2019 EP '''''[[The Love Train]]''''' was promoted through a press release, which drew controversy because of its "graphic nature and bizarre phrasing"? <small>Source: [https://www.nme.com/news/music/people-pretty-baffled-bizarre-super-horny-meghan-trainor-press-release-2449255 NME]</small> | * ... that [[Meghan Trainor]]'s 2019 EP '''''[[The Love Train]]''''' was promoted through a press release, which drew controversy because of its "graphic nature and bizarre phrasing"? <small>Source: [https://www.nme.com/news/music/people-pretty-baffled-bizarre-super-horny-meghan-trainor-press-release-2449255 NME]</small> | ||
** '''ALT1''':... that [[Meghan Trainor]]'s 2019 EP '''''[[The Love Train]]''''' was described as a teaser for her upcoming album ''[[Treat Myself]]''{{-?}} <small>Source: [https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop/8497232/meghan-trainor-love-train-ep-daryl-sabara-treat-myself-album-interview Billboard]</small> | ** '''ALT1''':... that [[Meghan Trainor]]'s 2019 EP '''''[[The Love Train]]''''' was described as a teaser for her upcoming album ''[[Treat Myself]]''{{-?}} <small>Source: [https://www.billboard.com/articles/columns/pop/8497232/meghan-trainor-love-train-ep-daryl-sabara-treat-myself-album-interview Billboard]</small> | ||
:* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Ulster Literary Theater]] | :* ''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/Ulster Literary Theater]] | ||
<small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:MaranoFan|MaranoFan]] ([[User talk:MaranoFan|talk]]). Self-nominated at 08:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC).</small> | <small>Improved to Good Article status by [[User:MaranoFan|MaranoFan]] ([[User talk:MaranoFan|talk]]). Self-nominated at 08:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC).</small> | ||
| − | |||
| − | |||
| − | |||
:* The stuff about the press release is interesting (much more so than the stuff about her upcoming album), but poorly phrased. I'll think about it. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 23:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC) | :* The stuff about the press release is interesting (much more so than the stuff about her upcoming album), but poorly phrased. I'll think about it. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 23:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC) | ||
| Line 26: | Line 18: | ||
*[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC) | *[[File:Symbol redirect vote 4.svg|16px]] Full review needed. [[User:BlueMoonset|BlueMoonset]] ([[User talk:BlueMoonset|talk]]) 01:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC) | ||
| − | *[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The article was promoted to Good Article status in time and it is reliably sourced with no copyright violations. I prefer the first hook. It was promoted with a press release like other things, but they normally don't cause such controversy. The hook is directly cited. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 03:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC) | + | *[[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] The article was promoted to Good Article status in time and it is reliably sourced with no copyright violations. I prefer the first hook. It was promoted with a press release like other things, but they normally don't cause such controversy. The hook is directly cited. [[User:SL93|SL93]] ([[User talk:SL93|talk]]) 03:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)</div><includeonly>|}}</includeonly><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> |
| − | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Latest revision as of 05:37, 1 September 2019
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:37, 1 September 2019 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
The Love Train
- ... that Meghan Trainor's 2019 EP The Love Train was promoted through a press release, which drew controversy because of its "graphic nature and bizarre phrasing"? Source: NME
- ALT1:... that Meghan Trainor's 2019 EP The Love Train was described as a teaser for her upcoming album Treat Myself ? Source: Billboard
Improved to Good Article status by MaranoFan (talk). Self-nominated at 08:37, 22 July 2019 (UTC).
- The stuff about the press release is interesting (much more so than the stuff about her upcoming album), but poorly phrased. I'll think about it. DS (talk) 23:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- How about, ALT2: ... that when Stephen Thomas Erlewine reviewed Meghan Trainor's EP The Love Train, he also reviewed the press release that promoted it? DS (talk) 23:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
- I agree that the original hook I suggested is more interesting than ALT1. I’m just not sure if the fact that Erlewine reviewed the press release is interesting in itself, as ALT2 completely neglects describing what made the press release noteworthy.—NØ 00:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- Yeah, it doesn't say why the press release was noteworthy... but that's what piques the reader's curiosity. Don't answer your own question. It was promoted with a press release - who cares? Lots of things are promoted with press releases. This particular press release got reviewed along with the item it promoted - what? That's weird, why did it get reviewed? *clicks link in order to find out* DS (talk) 13:07, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- I agree that the original hook I suggested is more interesting than ALT1. I’m just not sure if the fact that Erlewine reviewed the press release is interesting in itself, as ALT2 completely neglects describing what made the press release noteworthy.—NØ 00:53, 23 July 2019 (UTC)
- How about, ALT2: ... that when Stephen Thomas Erlewine reviewed Meghan Trainor's EP The Love Train, he also reviewed the press release that promoted it? DS (talk) 23:17, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
Full review needed. BlueMoonset (talk) 01:54, 21 August 2019 (UTC)
The article was promoted to Good Article status in time and it is reliably sourced with no copyright violations. I prefer the first hook. It was promoted with a press release like other things, but they normally don't cause such controversy. The hook is directly cited. SL93 (talk) 03:14, 23 August 2019 (UTC)