Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Casliber
(to prep area 2)
imported>SporkBot
m (Replace template per TFD outcome; no change in content)
 
Line 5: Line 5:
 
====The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown====
 
====The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown|The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown|The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown}}
{{*mp}}... that the '''[[The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown|Ritz-Carlton]]''' hotel in [[Georgetown (Washington, D.C.)|Georgetown]] is a former historic industrial building?
+
*... that the '''[[The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown|Ritz-Carlton]]''' hotel in [[Georgetown (Washington, D.C.)|Georgetown]] is a former historic industrial building?
 
:*'''ALT1''':... that the '''[[The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown|Ritz-Carlton]]''' hotel in [[Georgetown (Washington, D.C.)|Georgetown]] is known to be good for privacy?
 
:*'''ALT1''':... that the '''[[The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown|Ritz-Carlton]]''' hotel in [[Georgetown (Washington, D.C.)|Georgetown]] is known to be good for privacy?
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/MathStar]]
 
:*''Reviewed'': [[Template:Did you know nominations/MathStar]]

Latest revision as of 23:27, 7 March 2018

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Casliber (talk · contribs) 02:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)

The Ritz-Carlton, Georgetown

Created/expanded by Thine Antique Pen (talk). Self nom at 18:09, 26 June 2012 (UTC)

  • Pictogram voting keep.svg Article is new enough and long enough. I think people will read the article as DYK padding because of the length of the lead (which does indeed appear to be written in summary style and contain only facts from the body.) but 300 characters over.
  • Symbol question.svg Article only has three sources. Hook is cited to what appears to be a book site. This strikes me as a possible WP:RS problem. Can additional sources or more WP:RS sources be used for the hooked fact?
  • Symbol confirmed.svg QPQ done. No images to check. Neutral enough. Hook is properly formatted. No plagiarism concerns.


Symbol question.svg Sources needed. --LauraHale (talk) 00:45, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

 Added sources, should pass. Lead summarises the entire article. The hook fact is a quote from the source, and all the other references stand by that quote. TAP 15:38, 27 June 2012 (UTC)
Symbol confirmed.svgPictogram voting keep.svg Sources are reliable. Otherwise, good to go. --LauraHale (talk) 21:31, 27 June 2012 (UTC)