Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/The Three Kings"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>The C of E
imported>Jo-Jo Eumerus
(Review)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- REPLACE THIS LINE TO WRITE FIRST COMMENT, KEEPING  :-->
+
:* [[File:Symbol question.svg|16px]] Article has been expanded recently enough and is long enough. H.N. Bate is not mentioned in the source. Where is the Nativity mentioned in source #3? The source #4 does not say "for solo ''only''" Where is "translated ''for the local parish church''"? Not seeing the information on "Persian references" in the source given. I am also having some difficulty with the last two sentences of the "Music" paragraph. Finally, the last source does not appear to support its paragraph at all. Didn't notice any copyvio or plagiarism. Hook is moderately only interesting and needs the disambig link taken out. Otherwise ''seems'' well sourced, although I wonder about the use of italics in the source. QPQ is a bit short. [[User:Jo-Jo Eumerus|Jo-Jo Eumerus]] ([[User talk:Jo-Jo Eumerus|talk]], [[Special:CentralAuth/Jo-Jo Eumerus|contributions]]) 10:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)
 
 
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 10:08, 1 January 2017

The Three Kings

The Biblical Magi visiting Jesus
The Biblical Magi visiting Jesus

Created by The C of E (talk). Self-nominated at 00:35, 1 January 2017 (UTC).

  • Symbol question.svg Article has been expanded recently enough and is long enough. H.N. Bate is not mentioned in the source. Where is the Nativity mentioned in source #3? The source #4 does not say "for solo only" Where is "translated for the local parish church"? Not seeing the information on "Persian references" in the source given. I am also having some difficulty with the last two sentences of the "Music" paragraph. Finally, the last source does not appear to support its paragraph at all. Didn't notice any copyvio or plagiarism. Hook is moderately only interesting and needs the disambig link taken out. Otherwise seems well sourced, although I wonder about the use of italics in the source. QPQ is a bit short. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 10:08, 1 January 2017 (UTC)