Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Theora mesopotamica"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Innotata
(Undid revision 629129033 by G S Palmer (talk): no, mesopotamica was the original name, cadabra was later)
imported>Zanhe
(review)
Line 21: Line 21:
 
-->
 
-->
  
:* <!-- By replacing this line, write first comment here. -->
+
:* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, and well referenced. Hook is verified with inline reference. Text from PD source is properly attributed. Good to go. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 03:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)
  
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
 
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Revision as of 03:50, 18 October 2014

Theora mesopotamica

  • ... that Theora mesopotamica was once given the name Abra cadabra, because a scientist believed it "had been dead for a long time, and could be described as a cadaver"?
  • Reviewed: Archiponera
  • Comment: Some of the text is copied from and attributed to a PD source, but the article is long enough excluding that.

Created by Innotata (talk). Self nominated at 10:30, 14 September 2014 (UTC).

  • Symbol confirmed.svg New enough, long enough, and well referenced. Hook is verified with inline reference. Text from PD source is properly attributed. Good to go. -Zanhe (talk) 03:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC)