Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Theora mesopotamica"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
imported>Innotata (Undid revision 629129033 by G S Palmer (talk): no, mesopotamica was the original name, cadabra was later) |
imported>Zanhe (review) |
||
| Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
--> | --> | ||
| − | :* | + | :* [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] New enough, long enough, and well referenced. Hook is verified with inline reference. Text from PD source is properly attributed. Good to go. -[[User:Zanhe|Zanhe]] ([[User talk:Zanhe|talk]]) 03:50, 18 October 2014 (UTC) |
}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | }}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.--> | ||
Revision as of 03:50, 18 October 2014
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Theora mesopotamica
- ... that Theora mesopotamica was once given the name Abra cadabra, because a scientist believed it "had been dead for a long time, and could be described as a cadaver"?
- Reviewed: Archiponera
- Comment: Some of the text is copied from and attributed to a PD source, but the article is long enough excluding that.
Created by Innotata (talk). Self nominated at 10:30, 14 September 2014 (UTC).