Difference between revisions of "Template:Did you know nominations/Thomas Forsyth House"

From blackwiki
Jump to navigation Jump to search
imported>Yoninah
(strikethroughs)
imported>Yoninah
(to Prep 2)
 
Line 1: Line 1:
−
{{DYKsubpage
+
<noinclude>[[Category:Passed DYK nominations&nbsp;from December 2018]]<div style="background-color: #F3F9FF; margin: 2em 0 0 0; padding: 0 10px 0 10px; border: 1px solid #AAAAAA;">
−
|monthyear=December 2018  
+
:''The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. <span style="color:red">'''Please do not modify this page.'''</span> Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as [[{{TALKPAGENAME}}|this nomination's talk page]], [[Talk:{{SUBPAGENAME}}|the article's talk page]] or [[Wikipedia talk:Did you know]]), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. '''No further edits should be made to this page'''.''
−
|passed=<!--When closing discussion, enter yes, no, or withdrawn -->
+
 
−
|2=
+
The result was: '''promoted''' by [[User:Yoninah|Yoninah]] ([[User talk:Yoninah|talk]]) 17:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)<br />
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
{{DYK conditions}}
 
====Thomas Forsyth House====
 
====Thomas Forsyth House====
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Thomas Forsyth House|Thomas Forsyth House}}
 
{{DYK nompage links|nompage=Thomas Forsyth House|Thomas Forsyth House}}
−
<!--
 
−
 
−
                  Please do not edit above this line unless you are a DYK volunteer who is closing the discussion.
 
−
 
−
-->
 
 
*<s> ... that the '''[[Thomas Forsyth House]]''' was built after sawmill owner Forsyth discovered five other mill permits had been issued, and moved to [[Toquerville, Utah]]?</s>  <small>Source: ''[http://wchsutah.org/documents/historical-buildings-vol2.pdf Historical Buildings of Washington County]'', p.&nbsp;25.</small>
 
*<s> ... that the '''[[Thomas Forsyth House]]''' was built after sawmill owner Forsyth discovered five other mill permits had been issued, and moved to [[Toquerville, Utah]]?</s>  <small>Source: ''[http://wchsutah.org/documents/historical-buildings-vol2.pdf Historical Buildings of Washington County]'', p.&nbsp;25.</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':<s>... that the '''[[Thomas Forsyth House]]''' had a wine cellar until the [[LDS Church]] denounced the use of wine?</s> <small>Source: Ibid.</small>
 
** '''ALT1''':<s>... that the '''[[Thomas Forsyth House]]''' had a wine cellar until the [[LDS Church]] denounced the use of wine?</s> <small>Source: Ibid.</small>
Line 16: Line 11:
 
:* ''Comment'': I would appreciate feedback about potential [[Wikipedia:close paraphrasing|close paraphrasing]] of the NRHP nomination form.
 
:* ''Comment'': I would appreciate feedback about potential [[Wikipedia:close paraphrasing|close paraphrasing]] of the NRHP nomination form.
 
<small>Created by [[User:Kim Post|Kim Post]] ([[User talk:Kim Post|talk]]). Self-nominated at 09:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC).</small>
 
<small>Created by [[User:Kim Post|Kim Post]] ([[User talk:Kim Post|talk]]). Self-nominated at 09:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC).</small>
−
<!--
 
−
* {{DYKmake|Thomas Forsyth House|Kim Post|subpage=Thomas Forsyth House}}
 
−
* {{DYKnom|Thomas Forsyth House|Kim Post}}
 
−
-->
 
  
 
:* {{DYK checklist
 
:* {{DYK checklist
 
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
 
<!--Usage instructions: If the article/nomination is compliant with the relevant guideline, put "y"; if not, state what the problem is --->
−
|newness      = y<!---Was the article created, expanded (5x), moved to mainspace, or promoted to Good Article status within 7 days of the nomination?--->
+
|newness      = y
−
|length      = y<!---Is the article at least 1500 bytes long and not a stub?--->
+
|length      = y
−
|eligibilityother = <!---Note other general eligibility problems here (for example, article previously appeared on DYK); leave blank for none--->
+
|eligibilityother =  
−
|sourced      = y<!---Does the article contain at least one citation to a reliable source for each paragraph and direct quote?--->
+
|sourced      = y
−
|neutral      = y<!---Does the article cover all major viewpoints in a straightforward manner without using promotional or overly negative language?--->
+
|neutral      = y
−
|plagiarismfree = y<!---Is the article free of material copied from other sources?--->
+
|plagiarismfree = y
−
|policyother  = <!---Note other policy problems here (for example, article copied from another Wikipedia article without attribution); leave blank for none--->
+
|policyother  =  
−
|hookcited    = y<!---Check to see if the hook fact is backed by a source. If it is, check the source (if readily available) and make sure it contains the fact and is reliable. "AGF" (assume good faith) may be entered if hook it cited to an offline source--->
+
|hookcited    = y
−
|hookinterest = y<!---Is the hook reasonably interesting?--->
+
|hookinterest = y
−
|hookother    = <!---Note other hook problems here (for example, hook is over 200 characters); leave blank for none--->
+
|hookother    =  
−
|picfree      = NA<!---If the hook has a picture, is it freely licensed?  If no picture is used, put "NA"--->
+
|picfree      = NA
−
|picused      = <!---Is the picture used in the article (hook image may be a crop of an article image)?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
+
|picused      =  
−
|picclear    = <!---Is the picture easily discernible at 100px?  If no picture is used, leave blank--->
+
|picclear    =  
−
|qpq          = y<!---Check to make sure the nominator did a proper QPQ. If no QPQ was required (for example, user has less than five DYK credits), put "NA"--->
+
|qpq          = y
−
|status      = y<!---Put "y" if no problems, "?" for minor problems, "maybe" if nomination needs work, "no" if completely ineligible, "again" to request another reviewer take a look--->
+
|status      = y
−
|comments    = I think the paraphrasing is okay, but I have 1 question. Was it 1.5 stories, like the article says, or 2, like the source? Otherwise its good to go. <!---Put any other comments you may have here--->
+
|comments    = I think the paraphrasing is okay, but I have 1 question. Was it 1.5 stories, like the article says, or 2, like the source? Otherwise its good to go.  
−
|sign        = [[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 01:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)<!---Your signature.  Generally, can be left as is--->}}
+
|sign        = [[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 01:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)}}
 
::The National Register of Historic Places [https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/GetAsset/NRHP/82004184_text nomination], with a more professional analysis by an architectural historian, calls it 1.5 stories. I think ''Historic Buildings of Washington County'' simply doesn't observe the distinction. [[user:Kim Post|Kim&nbsp;Post]] ([[user talk:Kim Post|talk]]) 07:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 
::The National Register of Historic Places [https://npgallery.nps.gov/NRHP/GetAsset/NRHP/82004184_text nomination], with a more professional analysis by an architectural historian, calls it 1.5 stories. I think ''Historic Buildings of Washington County'' simply doesn't observe the distinction. [[user:Kim Post|Kim&nbsp;Post]] ([[user talk:Kim Post|talk]]) 07:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 
:::{{reply to|Kim Post}} thanks. Just wondering. its a nice article, good to go --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 17:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
 
:::{{reply to|Kim Post}} thanks. Just wondering. its a nice article, good to go --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 17:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Line 57: Line 48:
 
:::::::::::::* Changed as you suggested. [[user:Kim Post|Kim&nbsp;Post]] ([[user talk:Kim Post|talk]]) 21:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 
:::::::::::::* Changed as you suggested. [[user:Kim Post|Kim&nbsp;Post]] ([[user talk:Kim Post|talk]]) 21:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
 
:::::::::::::Sure, all3 passes: [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 02:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
 
:::::::::::::Sure, all3 passes: [[File:Symbol confirmed.svg|16px]] --[[User:DannyS712|DannyS712]] ([[User talk:DannyS712|talk]]) 02:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)
−
{{-}}}}<!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->
+
{{-}}</div></noinclude><!--Please do not write below this line or remove this line. Place comments above this line.-->

Latest revision as of 17:09, 18 February 2019

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Yoninah (talk) 17:09, 18 February 2019 (UTC)

Thomas Forsyth House

Created by Kim Post (talk). Self-nominated at 09:31, 29 December 2018 (UTC).

  • Lua error: expandTemplate: template "y" does not exist.
The National Register of Historic Places nomination, with a more professional analysis by an architectural historian, calls it 1.5 stories. I think Historic Buildings of Washington County simply doesn't observe the distinction. Kim Post (talk) 07:12, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Template:Reply to thanks. Just wondering. its a nice article, good to go --DannyS712 (talk) 17:20, 30 December 2018 (UTC)
Template:Ping How about ALT2 as a more "hooky" hook? Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:02, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping Yeah but reading alt2, I have no idea what this is supposed to mean... maybe something about they draining the entire cellar? --DannyS712 (talk) 07:04, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping Well it's an interesting incident, and I was thinking about the quirky spot. Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:17, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping If you want to propose alt2 (or 3, 4, etc) that is more "hooky," and Template:Ping is okay with the hooks, I'll take a look at them tomorrow. --DannyS712 (talk) 07:23, 29 January 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping I'm open to suggestions, but ALT2 doesn't seem like an improvement to me, either—it's not quirky because it explains exactly what happened. (And on reconsideration I think "Mormon Church" is more recognizable than "LDS Church".) You might render this more mysteriously as:
ALT2b: ... that wine was spilt in the Thomas Forsyth House because of the Mormon Church?
Kim Post (talk) 20:55, 30 January 2019 (UTC)
  • Symbol question.svg Template:Ping Where is this nomination holding? It's been over 2 weeks since the last post. Yoninah (talk) 19:57, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping The nomination has been approved since December 30. In my view, alternate hook suggestions from latecomers should not hold up a nomination when the approved hook meets all the requirements; please be bold in promoting them. Kim Post (talk) 21:03, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Template:Ping Then how about ALT3: ... that Thomas Forsyth stocked his cellar with wine until his wife cut loose and drained it all?
  • Changed as you suggested. Kim Post (talk) 21:59, 17 February 2019 (UTC)
Sure, all3 passes: Symbol confirmed.svg --DannyS712 (talk) 02:01, 18 February 2019 (UTC)